大学英语课程评价体系的构建被引量：56

On the Development of an Evaluation Model for College English

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文基于对课程评价的概念界定和核心理念的分析,提出构建大学英语课程评价体系的思路。作者认为,大学英语课程评价体系应汲取不同价值取向的评价模式之优势,对大学英语课程的设计、教学实施、教学效果和教师发展等环节开展分层分类的评价,采用多样化的评价方法,改变以考代评现象,发挥评价的审核和发展功能,实现提高大学英语教学质量的目标。在目前阶段,构建大学英语课程评价体系的主要任务有:建立评价指标体系,制定评价标准;完善评价制度,探索评价方法;培训评价人员,建立专业评价机构。 Based on a review of the definitions of curriculum evaluation and the models of educational evaluation, the paper proposes a systematic approach to developing an evaluation model for College English. It is suggested that the evaluation model, as a key component of the curriculum of College English, should draw on the strengths of dif- ferent evaluation models and be tailored to the needs of the types and levels of the institutions in which College Eng- lish is provided. The model should encourage the use of a variety of evaluation methods and evaluate in a systematic way each component of the curriculum, including, for example, curriculum design, implementation of teaching, outcome of teaching and learning, teacher development. By adopting such a comprehensive evaluation model, the current testing-oriented evaluation of College English will be replaced by an evaluation for accountability and devel- opment purposes, contributing to a higher quality of College English teaching and learning. At this initial stage, the major tasks of developing the evaluation model include the following： 1 ） developing the evaluation index system and specifying the evaluation criteria; 2） establishing the 3） training the evaluation personnel and establishing evaluation procedures and exploring the evaluation methods; professional evaluation organizations.

作者金艳

机构地区上海交通大学外国语学院

出处《山东外语教学》北大核心 2013年第5期56-62,共7页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

关键词大学英语课程评价评价理念评价体系 College English curriculum evaluation evaluation models evaluation system

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Alderson,J.C.& M.Scott.Insiders,outsiders and participatory evaluation[A].In J.C.Alderson & A.Beretta (eds.).Evaluating Second Language Education[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1992.25-58.
2Brown,J.D.The Elements of Language Curriculum:A Systematic Approach to Program Development[M].Boston:Heinle & Heinle Publishers,1995.
3Guba,E.G.& Y.S.Lincoln.Fourth Generation Evaluation[M].Beverly Hills,CA:Sage,1989.
4Kiely,R.& P.Rea-Dickins.Program Evaluation in Language Education[M].New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2005.
5Kiely,R.Small answers to the big question:Learning from language programme evaluation[J].Language Teaching Research,2009,13(1):99-116.
6Lewkowics,J.A.& D.Nunan.The limits of collaborative evaluation[J].TESOL Quarterly,1999,33 (4):681-700.
7Lynch,B.Language Programme Evaluation[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.
8Mackay R.Understanding ESL/EFL program review for accountability and improvement[J].ELT Journal,1994,48(2):142-149.
9Nevo,D.The conceptualization of educational evaluation:An analytical review of the literature[J].AERA,1983,53(1):117-128.
10Rea-Dickins,P.& K.Germaine.(eds.) Managing Evaluation and Innovation in Language Teaching[C].London:Longman,1998.