摘要
近年来,知识产权犯罪总量攀升,并呈现出高智能化、隐秘化特征,给被害人造成巨大经济损失,但囿于知识产权犯罪追诉模式、案件管辖、举证责任等方面存在的缺陷,无法给被害人提供有效的刑事救济。基于恢复性司法理论,刑事和解与知识产权犯罪的处理具有高度契合性,可在准确把握刑事和解真实意蕴的基础上,从案件范围、和解程序、和解协议、监督机制等诸方面构建知识产权犯罪的刑事和解制度。
In recent years, intellectual property crimes are increasingly high intelligent and invisible, and the amount of the crimes are rising as well. Thus, great economic loss has been caused to the victim by such crimes.However, it is unable to provide effective criminal protection to the victims because of the exsting defects in prosecution mode, jurisdiction and rules of burden of proof in intellectual property crimes.Based on the theory of restorative justice, criminal reconciliation and the settlement of intellectual property crime are highly consistent, which means we can construct criminal reconciliation system of intellectual property crimes on the basis of accurately grasping the true meaning of the criminal reconciliation from the scope of the case, reconciliation process, reconciliation agreement, supervision mechanism etc.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第11期45-49,82,共6页
Intellectual Property
基金
河北省社科基金课题:民事司法权力运行机制的改革与实践--以河北法院为例(HB13FX004)
中央高校基金基本科研业务费项目(12MS131)--限度与维度:法院在社会管理创新中的定位研究
关键词
知识产权犯罪
刑事和解
恢复性司法
intellectual property crime
criminal reconciliation
restorative justice
