摘要
本研究通过分析英语专业学生表达异议的方式以及英语水平对其的影响,考察对话中协同原则的使用。研究数据来源于中国学生英语口语语料库48名英语专业二年级学生的对话,笔者对三个不同水平组学生的异议表达方式进行了分类统计。结果显示对话双方表达异议时,协同方式多于非协同方式,从而验证了协同是对话的重要机制。研究还发现,口语水平不同的学习者对异议表达方式的选择表现出不同趋势。高水平者的表达方式更具多样性,也更能注意避免冲突发生。
The present study aims to investigate how English majors in China use the alignment principle while expressing disagreement by analyzing their ways of disagreement and the effects of proficiency on disagreement. The dyadic conversations of 48 subjects were selected as samples for data analysis from SECCL( Spoken English Corpus of Chinese Learners). The ways that the subjects of different proficiency levels used to express disagreement were categorized and tallied. It was found that when the students expressed disagreement,they chose to use significantly more alignment ways than non-alignment ways,which confirmed the hypothesis that alignment was an important mechanism of conversation. Moreover,compared to low achievers,high achievers showed more variety in expressing disagreement and they were inclined to use more alignment strategies.
出处
《外语教学理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期15-21,93,共7页
Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金
教育部人文社科项目"基于动态系统理论的二语学习频次效应模式构建"(11YJA740124)资助
关键词
协同原则
异议表达
英语对话
alignment principle
disagreement expression
English conversation
