期刊文献+

基于数据融合的全生命周期软件可信性定量评估方法 被引量:3

Quantitative Evaluation Across Software Development Life Cycle Based on Data Fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出了一种全生命周期的软件可信性定量评估方法。首先,建立全周期软件可信评估模型,对生命周期各阶段软件可信性进行逐层分解,分别设计定量或定性度量指标;然后,利用知识发现原理,获取软件可信特征树的权值分布;利用数据融合理论,对获得的多类型多量纲的可信度量数据进行分布式综合处理与推理;最后,给出软件可信性评估实例。工程实践表明,该方法能够有效保障软件评估过程的客观性和评估结果的准确度。 This paper brings out a method on quantitative software trustworthy evaluation across software development life cycle. First, builds a hierarchical assessment model with decomposition of software trustworthy on the various stages of software development life cycle, designs appropriate quantitative or qualitative metrics set; then, using of knowledge discovery in database techniques to obtain the weights of all software trustworthy characteristics; finally, using of data fusion theory to process and reason large volumes of multi--type measurement data. Engineering practice shows that it can effectively improve objectivity of the assessment process and the accuracy of the assessment results.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11A期192-195,213,共5页 Computer Science
关键词 软件定量评估 生命周期 数据融合 可信性 软件工程 Quantitative evaluation, Software development life neerlng cycle (SDLC),Data fusion, Trustworthy, Software engi
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献44

  • 1詹辉,张其才.提高铸铁材质的重大技术突破——记合肥工业大学、合肥工大双发信息系统技术有限公司“铸铁材质参数液态在线智能检测和质量控制系统”项目团队[J].中国科技奖励,2007(3):38-40. 被引量:3
  • 2Rawashdeh A,Matalkah B.A new software quality model for evaluating COTS components[J].Journal of Computer Science,2006.2(4):373-381.
  • 3High Confidence Software and Systems Coordinating Group.High Confidence Software and Systems Research Needs[R].2001-01-10[2008-09-24].http://www.ccic.gov/pubs/hcss-research.pdf.
  • 4Hasselbring W,Reussner R.Toward trustworthy software systems[J].IEEE Computer,2006,39(4):91-92.
  • 5Voas Jeffrey.Trusted software's holy grail.Software Quality Journal,2003,11(1):9-17.
  • 6Hua Z S,Gong B G,Xu X Y.A DS-AHP approach for multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2008,34(3):2221-2227.
  • 7Jung H W,Rim S G,Chung C S.Measuring software product quality:A survey of ISO/IEC 9126[J].IEEE Software,2004,21(5):88-92.
  • 8Yang J B,Wang Y M,Xu D L,et al.The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,171(1):309-343.
  • 9Yang J B.Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001.131(1):31-61.
  • 10Dai Y S,Xie M,Ng S H.Uncertainty analysis in software reliability modeling by Bayesian with maximum-entropy principle[J].IEEE Trans on Software Engineering,2007,33(1):781-795.

共引文献651

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部