摘要
目的：探讨静脉吸入复合气管插管全身麻醉（静吸复合麻醉）和静脉麻醉在颅内动脉瘤介入治疗时的效果。方法：选择2010年5月-2012年5月在我院进行麻醉的颅内动脉瘤介入治疗的患者46例作为研究对象，按照麻醉方法分为研究组和对照组，其中研究组为静吸复合麻醉，对照组为静脉麻醉，采用SPSS13.0进行统计分析，比较两组的麻醉效果。结果：两组患者手术时间比较，没有统计学意义（P〉0.05），而唤醒时间存在统计学意义（P0.05），但研究组脉搏和血压饱和度明显低于对照组（P0.05），而唤醒时间存在统计学意义（P0.05），且研究组的药物追加次数也明显低于对照组（P〉0.05）。结论：在颅内动脉瘤的介入治疗麻醉中，静吸复合麻醉比静脉麻醉更加安全可靠，有更好的临床效果，值得推广应用。
Objective：Discusses intravenous inhalation compound endotracheal intubation general anesthesia （static absorption compound anesthesia）, and the effect of intravenous anesthesia in interventional treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Methods：Choose in May 2010 to May 2012 two years in our hospital during anesthesia interventional therapy in patients with intracranial aneurysm of 46 cases as the research object,according to the anesthesia methods are classified into two groups,group and the control group,of which the team for static and suction compound anesthesia,intravenous anesthesia for control group, using SPSS13.0 statistical analysis,compared with two groups of anesthetic effect.Results：Two groups of the study group＇s operation time is no statistical significance （P〉0.05）,and wake up time exist statistical significance （P0.05）,but the team pulse and blood pressure saturation was significantly lower than the control group （P0.05）,and wake up time exist statistical significance （P0.05）,and the drug additional had markedly lower than that in control group （P〉0.05）.Conclusion：In intracranial aneurysm in interventional therapy of anesthesia,the static suction compound anesthesia than intravenous anesthesia more safety and reliable,have a better clinical effect,should increase the strength of promotion.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2013年第10期1664-1665,1667,共3页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
静吸复合
静脉麻醉
颅内动脉瘤
介入治疗
Static suction composite
Intravenous anesthesia
Intracranial aneurysms
Interventional therapy
