摘要
法官不能拒绝审判是现代社会一个普遍的司法原则,但对于具有较强技术性的专利案件,法官对技术问题的认定却经常力不从心。我国《专利法》颁布以来,法官依靠技术顾问、知识产权司法鉴定、技术专家陪审或者技术证人的帮助解决专利案件审理中的技术问题,是通过外部力量实现的。专利大国如德国、美国、日本和韩国分别实行技术法官、技术辅佐官、技术调查官和技术审理官制度,这些国家都在法院内部实现了对专业化问题的专门解决。我国应引入技术法官制度。
It is a common principle of justice in modern society that a judge cannot reject a trial. Nevertheless, when it comes to some patent cases of technical nature, the judge often feels helpless to the technical valida- tion of the related event. Since the promulgation of Patent Act of China, technical problems in patent case tri- als have been solved with the help of technical advisers, IPR judicial authentication, technical expert jury and technical witnesses, which is achieved by court with external influences. However, some countries such as Germany, USA, Japan and South Korea which own big amount of patents take ways o{ technical judge, technical assisted officer, technical investigation officer and technical hearing officer to solve same problems solved by internal forces of the court. The author of this article analyzes some malpractices of technical trials in China, suggesting that technical judge system should be introduced in China, and further advances ways of choosing and training technical judges.
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期68-72,共5页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基金
陕西省法学会2012年基金资助项目
关键词
专利案件
技术审理
技术法官
patent case
technical trial
technical judge
