基于政策执行的基层政府社会稳定风险评估——一项面向西部Z县的质性研究被引量：15

Social Stability Risk Assessment for Grassroots Government in the Perspective of Policy Implementation——A Qualitative Case Study of Western Z County

下载PDF

导出

摘要社会稳定风险评估的实施路径日益引起我国基层地方政府官员的关注,越来越成为现实工作推进中的突出问题之一。引入政策执行的分析视角,以我国西部Z县为调查样本,应用质性扎根理论对影响基层县级政府社会稳定风险评估机制的关键因素进行了探索性识别。研究显示:内隐意识、执行成本、行政系统规范、制度工具情境这四个主范畴对以县级政府为代表的基层社会稳定风险评估执行存在显著影响。在此基础上进一步提炼推进我国基层政府社会稳定风险评估制度实施的针对性思路,对当前一线实践具有典型的启示价值。 The implementation path of social stability risk assessment has brought about more concerns to Chinese local officials, and increasingly become one of the prominent problems in practical work. By adopting the grounded theory, this paper introduces the theoretical perspectives of policy implementation, gathers data from Z County through in-depth interviews, and undertakes an explorative identification research of the influential factors of social stability risk assessment for grassroots goverament. The study indicates that the four main categories that exert significant effects on social stability risk assessment at the grass-roots county level are implicit awareness, implementation costs, administrative specifications and system promote tools. On this basis, some social stability risk assessment.for grass-roots government, as is of practical significance.

作者刘泽照王惠佳黄杰

机构地区西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院西安交通大学管理学院西北政法大学刑事法学院

出处《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期606-612,共7页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基金国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(13CZZ032)

关键词社会稳定风险评估政策执行扎根理论基层政府 social stability risk assessment policy implementation grounded theory grassrootsgovernment

分类号 D63 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Van Meter D S, Van Implementation Process: A Administration and Society, Horn C E. The Policy Conceptual Framework[J. 1975,6(4) :445 - 468.
2Mazmunian D A, Sabatier P A. Implementation and Public Policy.- With a New Postscript [M]. Chicago: Scott Foresman Company, 1983.
3Lipsky M. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980.
4Berman P. The Study of Macro and Micro Implementation of Social Policy[J. Public Policy, 1978,26(2) :157 -184.
5Elmore R. Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions EJ. Political Science Quarterly, 1979,94(4) :601 - 616.
6Hjern B. Implementation Research: The Link Gone Missing[-J. Journal of Public Policy, 1982, 2 (3) : 301 - 308.
7Sabatier P A. Top-down and Bottom-up Approach to Implementation Research A Critical Analysis and Suggested SynthesisJ. Journal of Public Policy, 1986,6 (1):21 - 48.
8Matland R E. Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-conflict Model of Policy Implementation[J. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1995,5(2) :145 - 174.
9Goggin M L, Bowman A O. Studying the Dynamics of Public Policy Implementation: A Third generation Approach[ M] /// Palumbo D J, Calista D J. Implementation and the Policy Process Opening up the Black Box. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1990.
10Rhodes R A W, Marsh D. New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks [- J ]. European Journal of Political Research, 1992,21(2):181 - 205.