期刊文献+

公开谴责与后续治理的改善--基于财务舞弊公司面板数据的研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2005-2009年间因财务舞弊而被证监会、上交所和深交所谴责公告的80家A股上市公司为研究对象,并配对相应的控制公司,以舞弊被公告前1年到公告后3年为研究区间,通过配对t检验来观察舞弊公司某些治理变量在舞弊被发现前后的变化,通过多元回归分析来观察这些变化对公司绩效的影响。实证结果表明,财务舞弊公司在被公开谴责后会积极采取行动来改善内部公司治理机制,且部分后续治理行为有助于公司绩效的提高。 This paper takes 80 A-share listed firms which received enforcement actions from the Chinese Securities Regulatory Commis- sion, Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange due to financial frauds between 2005 and 2009 as samples, selects matched companies, and sets the first year before fraud detection to the third year after fraud detection as the research period. Paired t-test is used to observe the changes of the corporate governance variables and multiple regression analysis is used to see whether these actions will influence corporate performance. The empirical results show that the financial fraud companies will actively take action to improve the internal corporate governance mechanism, and some follow-up treatment behaviors will help to improve corporate performance.
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2013年第12期181-184,共4页 Enterprise Economy
基金 南昌大学社会科学研究基金项目“财务舞弊公司的后续治理研究”(批准号:12XGL04)
关键词 公开谴责 财务舞弊 公司治理 public condemnation financial fraud corporate governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Agrawal Anup, Jaffe, Jeffrey F, Karpof f JonathanM. Man- agement Turnover and Corporate Governance Changes Following the Revelation of Fraud[J] . Journal of Law& Economics, 1999, (42): 309 - 342.
  • 2蒲自立,刘芍佳.公司控制中的董事会领导结构和公司绩效[J].管理世界,2004,20(9):117-122. 被引量:94
  • 3Farber, David B. Restoring Trust after Fraud: Does Cor- porate Governance Matter? [J] . The Accounting Review, 2005, (80): 539 - 561.
  • 4沈艺峰,张俊生.ST公司董事会治理失败若干成因分析[J].证券市场导报,2002(3):21-25. 被引量:78
  • 5Beasley, Mark S. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial State- ment Fraud [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1996, (71 ) : 443 - 465.
  • 6陈关亭.我国上市公司财务报告舞弊因素的实证分析[J].审计研究,2007(5):91-96. 被引量:80
  • 7Jensen, M.C. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems[J] . Journal of Fi- nance, 1993, 48(3): 831 - 880.
  • 8Hemang, Desai. The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover[J]. The Accounting Review, 2006, 81 (1): 83 - 112.
  • 9PengSun, YiZhang. Is There Penalty For Crime: Cor- porate Scandal and Management Turnover in China[ D ] . Beijing: Peking Vniversity, 2006.
  • 10刘明辉,韩小芳.“谴责”能否促进财务舞弊的公司改善公司治理?[J].财经问题研究,2009(2):100-107. 被引量:19

二级参考文献85

共引文献263

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部