期刊文献+

宫颈癌筛查信念量表的信度和效度分析 被引量:7

Analysis on reliability and validity of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析宫颈癌筛查信念量表的信度和效度,评价其对宫颈癌筛查的价值。方法:以侯书逸开发的宫颈癌筛查信念量表为蓝本,修订形成中文版宫颈癌筛查信念量表。采用自填式信念量表调查1 575名社区妇女,使用内在一致性信度分析和因子分析对该问卷的信度与效度进行分析。结果:使用内在一致性信度分析将该量表修订为23个条目,修正过的量表的克朗巴哈α系数为0.939,说明量表信度较高。因子分析中KMO统计量为0.942,数据适合做因子分析。选择特征根大于1的因子生成4个量表维度,结合信念理论分别定义为"健康威胁知觉"、"行为好处知觉"、"主观行为准则"和"行动障碍知觉"。结论:问卷具有较好的信度和效度,适宜在中国城市社区妇女中使用。 Objective: To analyze the reliability and validity of cervical cancer screening self - eltlcacy scale, evaluate its value in cervical cancer screening. Methods: Cervical cancer screening self - efficacy scale developed by H0U Shu - Yi was used as the chief source to obtain the Chinese version after revise. A total of 1 575 community women were investigated by the self - filling cervical cancer screening self - efficacy scale, internal consistency reliability analysis and factor analysis were used to analyze the reliability and validity. Results: A total of 23 items were obtained after revise by internal consistency reliability analysis, Cronbaeh ot coefficient of revised scale was 0. 939, which indicated good reliability ; KMO statistical magnitude of factor analysis was 0. 942, which indicated that the data were suitable for factor analysis; the factors with characteristic root more than one were selected and formed four dimensions, which were defined as " perceived health threat" , " perceived benefits", " subjective norm" , and " perceived barriers" . Conclusion: The reliability and validity of cervi- cal cancer screening self - efficacy scale are good, and the scale is suitable for community women in urban areas of China.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第36期5921-5925,共5页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划资助〔2007BAI24B01〕 上海市公共卫生重点学科〔12GWZX0301〕
关键词 宫颈癌 信念量表 信度 效度 Cervical cancer Self- efficacy scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Champion VL, Scott CR. Reliability and validity of breastcancer screening belief scales in African American women[J] . Nursing Res, 1997,46 (6) : 331 -337.
  • 2Rakowski W, Clark MA, Pearlman DN, et al. Integratingpros and cons for mammography and pap testing : extendingthe construct of decisional balance to two behaviors[ J]. Pre-ventive Med, 1997, 26: 664 -673.
  • 3Hou S,Luh W. Psychometric properties of the cervical smearbelief inventory (CSBI) for Chinese women[J]. Int J Behav-ior Med, 2005, 12 (3) : 180-191.
  • 4Hou SI. Cancer Screening Belief Scale - Chinese Version(CSBS - C) : validation on scale psychometric properties a-mong a chinese worksite population [ J] . Californian J HealthPromotion, 2007,5 (2) : 79 -88.
  • 5张文彤.SPSS11统计分析教程(高级篇)[M].北京:北京希望电子出版社,2002.300-310.

共引文献97

同被引文献70

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部