摘要
近年来,两岸对于体育活动中产生的伤害事件,能否运用"自甘风险"理论作为被告免责的抗辩事由,以及"自甘风险"的理论内涵,展开一系列的广泛讨论。同时,两岸法院也在法律并无明文规定的情况下将"自甘风险"理论适用在具体案件的判决中。文章对于诸多学者的不同见解及法院判决对于"自甘风险"理论的诠释加以归纳整理。
In the recent years, extensive discussion about the theoretical connotation of ＂Assumption of Risk＂ and whether this theory can be used as a due defense in the sports-related cases has been staged on both sides of the Taiwan Straits. Meanwhile, the courts on both sides have used the theory of Assumption of Risk in the judgment of the cases though there is no such rule in the law. The article summarizes the different opinions of the scholars and the courts＇ explanation on using the theory of Assumption of Risk in the judgment.
出处
《体育科研》
2013年第6期37-40,53,共5页
Sport Science Research
