期刊文献+

山西平朔露天矿区复垦农用地表层土壤质量差异对比 被引量:27

Soil Quality of Surface Reclaimed Farmland in Large Open-cast Mining Area of Shanxi Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以复垦农用地为研究对象,以原地貌未受损农用地和排土场未复垦地作为对照,共选择18个样地,对比研究复垦农用地、未复垦地及原地貌未受损农用地的土壤容重、田间持水量、pH值、有机质、全氮、全钾、有效磷、速效钾的差异,揭示复垦农用地土壤重构的过程及变异的规律。结果表明:(1)复垦农用地土壤容重、田间持水量、pH值、全钾、有效磷、速效钾的均值都略高于未受损农用地;而复垦农用地有机质、全氮的均值都略低于未受损农用地。(2)复垦农用地和未受损农用地在0-10cm的土壤容重及pH值均略低于10~20cm土层;0~10cm的土壤肥力指标均值略高于10~20em土层。(3)在0~10cm土层,复垦耕地和复垦林地的相关土壤理化性质要优于未受损耕地;在10—20cm,复垦林地土壤理化性质基本上优于未受损耕地。(4)复垦13年的耕地土壤容重、速效钾与未受损耕地差异不显著;复垦22年林地的单个土壤理化指标基本上优于复垦19年林地,复垦19年林地的单个土壤理化指标基本上优于未受损林地。 To assess the impacts of land reclamation on soil quality in mining area, we compared the physicochemical properties of surface soils from reclaimed farmlands with those from the un-reclaimed lands and undamaged farmlands using a total of 18 plots with different land types and reclamation duration. All reclaimed farmlands had higher soil bulk density, field moisture capacity, pH, total phosphorus, total potassium, available phosphorus and available potassium, but lower organic matter and total nitrogen than the undamaged farmlands did. For both re- claimed and undamaged agriculture lands, soils had lower density and pH, but better soil fertility at 0-10 cm than at 10-20 em layers. Most of the physieoehemical properties of soils at the depth of 0~10 cm were higher in the reclaimed cultivated lands and reclaimed woodlands than in the undamaged cultivated lands. Soil bulk density and available potassium of the cultivated lands with 13 year reclamation were not significantly different from those of the undamaged farmlands. Most of the physicochemical properties of the woodlands with 19 years reclamation were better than those of the undamaged woodlands. Taking together, reclaiming lands in mining areas would improve soil quality.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期2422-2428,共7页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 2012年国土资源部公益行业项目(201211084)
关键词 排土场复垦 农用地 土壤质量 露天矿 reclamation of dump site farmland soil quality open-cast mining
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1白中科,李晋川,王文英,丁新启,柴书杰,陈建军,卢崇恩,赵景逵.中国山西平朔安太堡露天煤矿退化土地生态重建研究[J].中国土地科学,2000,14(4):1-4. 被引量:33
  • 2Jacinthe P A, Lal R. Spatial variability of soil properties and trace gas fluxes in reclaimed mine land of southeastern Ohio[J]. Geodernu~ 2006, 136( 3 ) : 598-608.
  • 3Lewis D E, White J R, Wafula D, et al. Soil functional diversity analysis of a Bauxite-Mined restoration chronosequence[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2010, 59(4) :710-723.
  • 4Shrestha R K, Lal R. Ecosystem carbon budgeting and soil carbon se- questration in reclaimed mine soil[J]. Environment International, 2006, 32(6):781-796.
  • 5Tabir K, Ender M. Some soil properties on coal mine spoils reclaimed with black locust (Robinia pceudoacocia L. ) and umbrella pine (P/nus pinea L ) in Agacli-Istanbul[J]. Environment Monitor Assessment, 2009, 159(1-4) :407-414.
  • 6Miao Z, Mars R. Ecological restoration and land reclamation in open-cast mines in Shanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Man- agement, 2000, 59(3) :205-215.
  • 7Wong M H. Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 50(6 ) :775-780.
  • 8Banning N C, Lalor B M, Cookson W R, et al. Analysis of soil microbial community level physiological profiles in native and post-mining reha- bilitation forest:Which substrates discriminate[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2012, 56: 27-34.
  • 9樊文华,白中科,李慧峰,乔俊耀,许建伟.不同复垦模式及复垦年限对土壤微生物的影响[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(2):330-336. 被引量:61
  • 10Renetzeder C, Schindler S, Peterseil J, et al. Can we measure ecological sustainability? Landscape pattern as an indicator for naturalness and land intensity at regional and European level[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10( 1 ) : 38-49.

二级参考文献146

共引文献544

同被引文献549

引证文献27

二级引证文献184

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部