期刊文献+

当事人主义刑事诉讼与证据开示 被引量:85

The Principle of Party in Criminal Litigation and the Discovery of Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证据开示是当事人主义刑事诉讼实质化所不可缺少的制度 ;检察官的当事人性与其证据开示责任并不矛盾 ;法治国家关于证据开示的争论已经得出利大于弊的结论。中国审判方式的改革应当注重对抗制审判的精神 ,而不能偏重其形式 ; WT5”BZ]:The discovery of evidence is an essential system in the essence of the principle of parties for criminal litigation. The prosecutor in person is not in contradiction with its liability of the discovery of evidence. The debate on the discovery in a state ruled by law has concluded it's more advantageous. The reform of trial method in China should pay attention to the spirit of adversary trial system but not the form. It will become an important content in the trial reform to set up a special discovery system of evidence. [WT5”HZ]
作者 孙长永
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《法律科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2000年第4期83-95,共13页 Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law)
关键词 证据开示 对抗制 审判方式改革 竞技型司法 iscovery of evidence Adversary trial system Reforms on trial method Judiciary of competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1日本《最高法院刑事判例集》第23卷4号.第248页.
  • 2[日]阿部纯二.学说判例刑事诉讼法[M].青林书院新社,1981,第193页.
  • 3英国《1996年刑事程序与侦查法》第9条.
  • 4[日]铃木茂嗣.刑事诉讼庋[M].第163页.
  • 5[日]田村正义."刑事诉讼法五十年与刑事辩护实务"[J].实用法律杂志,1999,(1).
  • 6日本律师联合会的提案.关于证据开示的立法措施的申辩书[A].自由与正义[C].39卷8号,19988年.
  • 7[日]平野龙一.侦查与人权[M].有斐阁,1981.91.
  • 8J. Spencer, Disciourse of Evidence in England and Wales - Progress or Regression? in Proceedings of the First World Conference on New Trends in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. Johan P. Nijboer & Jon M. Reijnties ed. P. 609, 1995.
  • 9John Sprack, The Criminal Procedure and Investigation Act 1996: (1) The Duty of Discloure, (1997) Cr. L. R. 319.
  • 10(1993) 96 Cr. App. R. 1.

共引文献14

同被引文献598

引证文献85

二级引证文献387

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部