期刊文献+

Debt Rating Initiations: Natural Evolution or Opportunistic Behavior?

Debt Rating Initiations: Natural Evolution or Opportunistic Behavior?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The authors examine a firm's decision to begin issuing debt in public bond markets and find that it is a function of both life cycle influences and opportunistic timing. Defining life cycle factors to encompass both a firm's age in years and its underlying characteristics, the authors confirm that bond market participation is generally restricted to large, mature firms. Summary statistics show that finns obtain their initial bond ratings on average 9.5 years after their equity initial public offering (IPO) and 11.8 years after initiating dividend payments. Growth rates, capital expenditures, and cash flow volatility all decline as the firm accesses public debt markets, consistent with entry into the mature phase of its life cycle. With respect to opportunistic timing, it is asked whether entry into public bond markets follows strong performance (or precedes weak performance) at both the firm and market levels. At the firm level, the authors find that the debt IPO occurs following periods of strong operating performance and high excess stock returns. At the market level, entry coincides with favorable interest rates and default spreads. The benefits of careful timing result in firms receiving initial bond ratings that are stronger than what would be predicted; however, there is no evidence of abnormal numbers of downgrades for these firms in subsequent years.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2013年第12期1574-1595,共22页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 debt rating debt issuance bond rating firm life cycle market timing 自然进化 评级 债务 债券市场 行为 生命周期 成熟阶段 数据显示
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Aivazian, V., Booth, L., & Cleary, S. (2006). Dividend smoothing and debt ratings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(2), 439-453.
  • 2Altman, E. (! 968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
  • 3Barry, C. B., Mann, S. C., Mihov, V. T., & Rodriguez, M. (2008). Corporate debt issues and the historical level of interest rates. Financial Management, 37(3), 413-430.
  • 4Burch, T., Christie, W., & Nanda, V. (2004). Do firms time equity offerings? Evidence from the 1930s and 1940s. Financial Management, 33(1), 5-23.
  • 5Chan, K., Ikenberry, D. L., & Lee, I. (2007). Do managers time the market? Evidence from open-market share repurchases. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(9), 2673-2694.
  • 6Chang, X., Hilary, G., Shih, C. M., & Tam, L. H. K. (2010). Conglomerate structure and capital market timing. Financial Management, 39(4), 1307-1338.
  • 7DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Stulz, R. (2006). Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 227-254.
  • 8DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Stulz, R. (2010). Seasoned equity offerings, market timing, and the corporate life cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3), 275-295.
  • 9Fama, E., & French, K. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
  • 10Fama, E., & French, K. (2005). Financing decisions: Who issues stocks? Journal of Financial Economics, 76(3), 549-582.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部