承接跨国外包对我国生产率的动态影响被引量：2

Dynamic Effects of Multinational Outsourcing on the Local Enterprises Productivity in China

导出

摘要本文基于价值链内厂商间关系考察了跨国外包强度和跨国外包方式分别对当地企业生产率变动的动态作用机制。在以杭州、宁波、湖州、温州等四个地市396家企业调研数据为样本的实证研究中,发现跨国外包强度与生产率之间具有显著的倒U型关系。将跨国外包方式分为价值链驱动模式和价值链治理方式之后,研究发现价值链驱动模式对当地企业生产率的影响存在不确定性,而价值链治理方式对生产率的影响却是显著的:随着跨国公司对当地企业控制程度的提高,生产率有着不同程度的下降趋势。研究结论意味着我国当地企业通过跨国外包获取一定的技术能力之后,积极发展自主技术才是适宜的发展路径。 This paper analyzes the dynamic mechanism of multinational outsourcing intensity and outsourcing model on the local enterprises productivity based on relationship among enterprises in the GVC. The paper finds that the relationship between multinational outsourcing intensity and local enterprises productivity is significantly inverted U-shaped with 396 enterprises data distributing Hangzhou,Ningbo, Huzhou, Wenzhou. Outsourcing model can be divided into two types： value chain driven model and value chain governance model. The results show that the effect of value chain driven model on productivity has some uncertainty. But the effect of value chain governance model is significant. Local enterprise productivity is declining with more control of transnational corporations. The results imply that it＇s the right developing way for our local enterprises to actively develop independent technical capability after they obtain certain technical ability through outsourcing.

作者王俊

机构地区浙江工商大学经济学院

出处《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期94-104,共11页 Finance & Trade Economics

基金国家社会科学基金"跨国外包的技术进步效应"(12FJY010) 浙江省软科学项目"从采购商驱动的GVC向流通主导的NVC跨越:浙江传统制造业升级路径研究"(2013C25058) 教育部人文社科重点基地浙江工商大学现代商贸研究中心项目"跨国外包与代工企业技术升级"(13JDSM07)

关键词跨国外包全球价值链生产率 Multinational Outsourcing,Global Value Chain,Productivity

分类号 F276.7 [经济管理—企业管理] F274 [经济管理—企业管理] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Ivarsson, I. , Alvstam, C. G. , Supplier Upgrading in the Home-Furnishing Value Chain: An Empirical Study of IKEA's Sourcing in China and South East Asia. World Development, Vol. 38, No. 11, 2010, pp. 1575-1587. 16.
2Feenstra, R. C. , Hanson, G. H. , The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979- 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 3, 1999, pp. 907- 941. 11.
3Saliola, F. , Zanfei, A. , Multinational Firms, Global Value Chains and the Organization of Knowledge Transfer. Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009, pp. 369-381. 19.
4Hall, R. , Jones, C., Why do Some Countries Produce so much more Output per Worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vo1.114, No.l, 1999, pp. 83 116. 14.
5Griliches, Z. , Mairesse, J. , R:D and Productivity Growth: Comparing Japanese and U. S. Manufacturing Firms. In Charles, H. (eds.), Productivity Growth in Japan and United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp. 317-340. 13.
6Clerides, S. , Lach, S. , Tybout, J. , Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, No. 3, 1998, pp. 903-947. 10.
7Kumar, N. , Aggarwal, A. , Liberalization, Outward Orientation and in-house R:D Activity of Multinational and Local Firms: A Quantitative Exploration for Indian Manufacturing. Research Policy, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2005, pp. 441 -460. 17.
8Schmitz, H., Knorringa, P., Learning from Global Buyers. Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2000, pp. 177-205. 20.
9王茜.中国制造业是否应向“微笑曲线”两端攀爬——基于与制造业传统强国的比较分析[J].财贸经济,2013,34(8):98-104. 被引量：44
10Bernard, A. , J ensen, J. B. , Exceptional Export Performance:Case, Effect, or Both? Journal of International Economics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1999, pp. 1-25. 9.