期刊文献+

三种交联剂对牙本质粘结强度的影响

The Effects of Three Kinds of Crosslinking Agents on Dentin Bond Strength
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨三种交联剂对牙本质粘结强度影响的情况。方法分析48颗无龋坏、无明显磨损、大小形态相似,发育正常的成人第三磨牙,制备粘结界面并对粘结界面玷污层进行制备,对照组为12颗,实验I组(戊二醛组)12颗,实验II组(原花色素组)12颗,实验III组(京尼平组)12颗。结果实验III组粘结强度显著高于实验I组和实验II组,各组的湿粘结组的粘结强度均显著高于干粘结组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论三种交联剂对牙本质粘结强度影响表明京尼平组的粘结效果更佳,推荐临床上使用。 Objective To investigate the effects of three kinds of crosslinking agent on dentin bond strength. Methods 48 normal adult third molars with the same size and shape, but no caries and obvious wear were analyzed. Bonding interface and the smear layer of bonding interface were prepared. There were 12 molars in the control group, 12 molars in the experimental group I (glu- taraldehyde group), 12 molars in the experimental group II (proanthocyanidins group) and 12 in the experimental group III (genipin group). Results The bond strength of experimental group III was higher than that of experimental group I and experimental group II, bond strength of wet bond team of each group was significantly higher than that of dry bond team, P〈0.05, the differences were statistical significant. Conclusion The comparison of the effect of three kinds of cross-linking agents on dentin bond strength shows that genipin's binding effect is the best and which is recommended to be used in clinical practice.
出处 《中外医疗》 2013年第35期21-21,23,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 粘结 生物交联剂 强度 Bond Biological crosslinking agent Strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1李临生,张京东,张昌辉.戊二醛消毒剂的特点与应用[J].日用化学工业,2004,34(6):385-389. 被引量:15
  • 2陈亚琴,蔡玉惠.牙本质的表面状态对黏接剂粘接强度的影响[J].口腔医学,2006,26(3):197-199. 被引量:9
  • 3闫晶,赵颖煊,赵信义,施长溪.氨化硝酸银染色对牙本质黏结试样黏结强度的影响[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2007,17(6):351-354. 被引量:9
  • 4宋钰.酸碱滴定法测定戊二醛含量影响因素的研究[J].中国消毒学杂志,2007,24(4):325-327. 被引量:6
  • 5Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, et al. Dental adhesion review : Aging and stability of the bonded interface [ J ]. Dent Mater,2008, 24(1) :90 - 101.
  • 6Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, et al. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review [ J ] . Dent Mater, 1995,11 ( 2 ) : 117 - 125.
  • 7Tay FR, Pashley DH. Dental adhesives of the future [ J ]. J Adhes Dent,2002,4(2) :91 - 103.
  • 8Karadag LS, Bala O, Turkuz E, et al. The effects of water and acetone- based dentin adhesives on apical microleakage [ J ]. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ,2004,15 ( 5 ) : 1 - 7.
  • 9Khatri CA , Stansbury JW, Sehuhheisz CR ,et al. Synthesis , characterization and evaluation of urethane derivatives of Bis - GMA [ J]. Dent Mater ,2003 , 19 (7) :584 - 588.
  • 10Toledano M, Osorio R, Ceballos L, et al. Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to different dentin depths [ J ]. Am J Dent. 2003,16 ( 5 ) :292 - 298.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部