期刊文献+

腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术治疗肝胆管结石病临床效果观察 被引量:12

A preliminary evaluation the efficacy of laparoscope combined choledochoscope shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of hepatobiliary calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术治疗肝胆管结石的临床效果。方法回顾性2011年2月至2012年2月手术治疗肝胆管结石病的患者62例的临床资料,其中腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术(联合组)28例,传统开腹手术组34例,观察两组的临床效果。结果两组碎石成功率均为100%,结石取尽率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但在手术时间、术中出血、胃肠功能恢复时间及住院时间方面,微创组明显优于开腹组;术后消化道出血和切口感染发生率低于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下胆道镜联合微爆破碎石术治疗肝胆管结石病,具有微创、安全、有效的优点。 Objective To explore the differences between laparoscope combined with choledochoscope shockwave lithotripsy and open operation in the treatment of intrahepatobiliary and extrahepatobiliary calculi. Methods The clinical data of 62 consecutive patients with intrahepatobiliary and extrahepatobiliary calculi who received treatment from February 2011 to February 2012 were retro- spectively analyzed. Laparoscope combined with Choledochoscope shockwave lithotripsy was applied to 28 patients ( combined group), whereas open operation was applied to the rest 34 patients (operation group). Hospital stay and complications have been analyzed. Re- suits The lithotripsy successful ratio of two groups was 100%. The hepatobiliary calculi's cleaning out ratio of two group was not statis- tically significant( P 〉 O. 05 ). However the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery of gastroentestine, hospital stay of the pa- tients who were treated by combined group were much shorter than who were treated by operation group. Gastrointestinal bleeding and wound infection have rarely happened in combine group,The difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Laparo- scope combined with choledochoscope shockwave lithotripsy is proved safe and worth promoting.
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2014年第1期152-154,共3页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 绵阳市卫生局科研项目(编号:201117)
关键词 肝胆管结石 腹腔镜 胆道镜 微爆破碎石 Hepatobiliary calculi Laparoscope Choledochoscope Plasmakinetic
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1范德标,许建平,简锋.胆道再次手术68例临床分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(2):189-190. 被引量:3
  • 2Sarli L, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis : 10-year experience [ J ]. World Sury, 2003, 27 : 180-186.
  • 3Okada M, Fukada J, Toya K, et al. The value of drip infusion cholangiography using mnltidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis [ J ]. Eur Radiol, 2005,10 : 2140-2145.
  • 4Williams E J, Green J, Beckingham I, et al. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) [ J ]. Gut, 2008,57 (7) : 1004-1021.
  • 5Hamy A, Hennekinne S,Pessaux P, et al. Endoscopic sphincterrotomy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the tyeatment of cholelithiasis[ J] . Sury Endosc,2003 ,17 :872-875.
  • 6Watanabe H, Yoneda M, Tominaga K, et al. Comparison between endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones [ J ]. J Gastroenterol, 2007,42:56-62.
  • 7Watanbe H,Yoneda M,Tominaga K, et al. Comparison between endoscopic papillary balloom dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones [ J ]. J Gastroenterol, 2007,42:56-62.
  • 8Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Samari J, et al. Thirteen years experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and log-termresuhs [ J ]. Surg Endose, 2007, 21:34-40.
  • 9吴阶平 裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M](第6版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1269.
  • 10吴阶平,裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1994:1 019

共引文献523

同被引文献108

引证文献12

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部