期刊文献+

β-tubulin Ⅲ在食管癌中的表达及在个体化化疗方案中的作用

Individualized Chemotherapy Based on the Expression of β-tubulin Ⅲ in Esophageal Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨β-tubulin Ⅲ在食管癌组织中的表达,分析其与食管癌生物学行为的关系,及根据其表达结果制定个体化化疗方案的疗效。方法:应用免疫组化(SP)法检测β-tubulin Ⅲ在55例食管癌组织中的阳性表达,采用x2检验方法分析其阳性表达与肿瘤临床病理学特征之间的关系。依据低表达(阴性)对紫杉类抗微管药物相对敏感,选用紫杉醇联合顺铂方案;高表达(阳性)相对不敏感的原则,选择吉西他滨联合顺铂方案。对照组选用紫杉醇联合顺铂化疗方案。比较两组客观缓解率(ORR)及疾病控制率(DCR)的差异,及无进展生存时间(PFS)和中位生存期(MST)的差异。结果:β-tubulin Ⅲ在55例食管癌组织中阳性表达为16例(29.09%),在肿瘤组织中的表达与食管癌的浸润深度、淋巴结转移及肿瘤分期相关(P<0.05),而与年龄、性别、组织学分化程度无关(P>0.05)。实验组ORR为54.55%(30/55)优于对照组32.50%(13/40),x2=4.543,P=0.033;DCR为69.09%(38/55)优于对照组47.50%(19/40),x2=4.498,P=0.034。差异有统计学意义。实验组与对照组的PFS分别为5.2月和4.5月(x2=4.215,P=0.040),MST分别为8.9月和7.4月(x2=6.146,P=0.013),差异有统计学意义。结论:食管癌细胞存在β-tubulinⅢ的表达,且与肿瘤细胞的浸润深度、淋巴结转移及临床分期相关。检肿瘤标本中β-tubulinⅢ的表达,有助于为实施个体化化疗提供一种选择药物的方法。 Objective: To identify the expression of β-tubulin III in esophageal carcinoma and relationship to the biological behavior of esophageal carcinoma, and to know the curative effect of individualized chemotherapy based on the gene expression. Methed: The expression of [3-tubulin III were detected by immunohistochemistry SP method in 55 esophageal carcinoma tissues, the relationship be- tween the clinicopathological features and the expressions of-tubulin III were analyzed. Selecting individualized chemotherapy combinded with two kinds of drugs based on the expression results, with the principle that low (negative) expression in tumor is sensitive anti-microtubule drugs, selected chemotherapy scheme combinded with paclitaxel and cisplatin; higher (positive) expression is relative low sensitivity, selected gemcitabine and cisplatin. In control group, the chemotherapy scheme combinded with paclitaxel and cisplatin was selected. The differences of curative effect rate and clinical benefit rate of the two groups were compared. Result: The positive rates of β-tubulin III ex- pression in esophageal carcinoma tissues was 29.09%, the positive rates had relationship to the depth of tumor infiltration, lymph node metastasis and clinical stage (P〈0.05), had no relationship to age, sex and the degree of histological differentiation of the patients (P〉0.05). The Objective Response Rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) of experimental group were better than the control group (54.55 % vs 32.50%, x^-4.543; 69.09%vs 47.50%0, x2=-4.498; respectively P〈0.05 for each). The median PFS of the experimental group was 5.2 months and the control group was 4.5 months, showing significant difference (x^-4.215, P=0.040). The MST of the two groups re- spectively was 8.9 months and 7.4 months, with significant difference (x2=-6.146,P=0.013). Conclusion: The detection of β-tubulin III in esophageal carcinoma tissues had relationship to the depth of tumor infiltration, lymph node metastasis and clinical stage, could reduce drugs effect. Individualized chemotherapy can be selected based on the expression of β-tubulin III.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2013年第34期6668-6672,共5页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81101085) 江苏省盐城市科技发展计划项目(YK2007124) 黑龙江省教育厅面上项目(12521220)
关键词 食管癌 β-tubulinⅢ 免疫组化 个体化化疗 Esophageal carcinoma β-tubulin III Immunohistochemistry Individualized chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Millar J, Scullin P, Morrison A, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced/metastatic oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer, 2005, 93:1112-1116.
  • 2Kroep JR, Pinedo HM, Giaccone G, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of cisplatin preceding gemcitabine in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. Ann Oncol, 2004, 15:230-235.
  • 3Lorenzen S, Duyster J, Lersch C, et al. Capecitabine plus docetaxel every 3 weeks in first- and second-line metastatic oesophageal cancer : final results of a phase Ⅱ trial. Br J Cancer, 2005, 92 : 2129-2133.
  • 4Assersohn L, Brown G, Cunningham D, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma. Ann Oncol, 2004, 15:64-69.
  • 5Bepler G, Kusmartseva I, Sharma S, et al. RRM1 modulated in vitro and in vivo efficacy of gemcitabine and platinum in non-small- cell lung cancer. J C lin Oucol, 2006, 24:4731-4737.
  • 6徐兵河.耐药问题和对策//孙燕,石远凯.临床肿瘤内科手册.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:194-195.
  • 7Evans WE, Relling MV. Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics. Science, 1999, 286: 487- 491.
  • 8Evans WE, McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics -- drug disposition, drug targets, and side effects. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348:538- 549.
  • 9Davidson JD, Ma L, Flagella M, et al. An increase in the expression of ribonucleotide reductase large subunit 1 is associated with gemcitabine resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res, 2004, 64:3761-3766.
  • 10Rosen R, Danenberg KD, Albemla V, et al. Ribonucleotide reductase messenger RNA expression and survival in gemcitabine/cisplatintreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10 : 1318-1325.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部