摘要
法条竞合,是指在法条动态适用过程中,似乎有数个法条可以评价待决行为事实,但实际上仅有一个法条具有评价资格的情形。法条竞合是一种非真正竞合,其实乃评价主体的一种主观"误认",其原因是错综复杂的法条规定所导致的找法困难。刑法分则法条本质上具有互斥性,所谓的法条逻辑类型并不具有确定性,最终仍将归结为对构成要件的解释。因此,法条竞合基本上是一个虚化的概念,并不存在一个可验证性的标准,其理论价值相当有限。即使取消法条竞合概念,也不会给案件认定带来实质性的影响。不过,法条竞合概念仍然具有一定的对照功能,特别是在界定想象竞合犯、明确刑罚适用原则等方面。
Gesetzeskonkurrenz, as a kind of phenomenon, happens in the dynamic judicial process. In the case it seems that several legal provisions can be used to evaluate the pending act, but in fact only one of these provisions is quali- fied for the evaluation. Gesetzeskonkurrenz is not a real competition, for in essence it just is judge~ subjective mistake due to the difficulties in finding the appropriate provision among the intricate and complex laws. Inherently, all the provisions in criminal law are respectively exclusive, and the so - called the logic relationship of provisions is uncertain and finally will be attributed to interpretation of constitution. Therefore, gesetzeskonkurrenz is more than an empty concept. It cannot pro- vide a verifiable standard, thus its theoretical value is very limited. Even if the concept is abandoned, it will not cause any difficulty to the decision of cases. However, gesetzeskonkurrenz still has some comparative functions, especially in defining idealkonkurrenz and the principle of punishment.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期98-108,共11页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
光华教育基金会和浙江大学光华法学院两岸法治交流项目
浙江大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
关键词
法条竞合
假性竞合
行为事实
构成要件类型
重复评价
gesetzeskonkurrenz
scheinbarekonkurrenz
facts
types of constitution
double evaluation
