期刊文献+

企业绿色创新战略的驱动因素:多案例比较研究 被引量:54

Driving Factors of Green Innovation Strategy:Multiple Case Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 企业绿色创新战略是应对当前生态环境日益恶化的重要途径。加强对企业的引导和管制,促进企业转向绿色生产方式已成为一个亟待解决的重大课题。通过深度访谈,应用扎根理论研究影响企业实施绿色创新战略的深层次因素后发现,预期经济收益、冗余资源和利益相关者压力等三个主范畴对绿色创新战略存在显著影响。预期经济收益是前置变量,冗余资源是内部情境变量,利益相关者压力是外部情境变量,但它们影响绿色创新战略的方式和路径并不一致。研究结论可为政府在转变企业经营模式上制定有效的管制政策提供政策建议和实施路径。 Since the industrial revolution, technology has contributed to rapid socioeconomic development, but has also caused a sharp deterioration of the ecological environment. Thus, corporate green innovation strategy has been rising at the right time to cope with the current deteriorating ecological environment. It is an urgent task nowadays to strengthen the guidance and control of enterprises, and to make enterprises shift to green production. Although the previous literature abroad has explored the influencing factors of green innovation strategy, researchers are constrained to their specific subject areas so there is no one theoretical framework that is widely accepted among scholars by far. Furthermore, the research findings before are also in dispute, sometimes even contradictory, especially lacking in-depth study of the mechanism of factors influencing the green innovation strategy. From the micro perspective, this paper probes into the key elements that affect the implementation of green innovation strategy and their impacting mechanisms, and multiple case studies in grounded theory has been employed to explore the drivers of green innovation strategy, which has used a dozen of typicalenterprises in heavy polluting industries as objects. Through in-depth interviews, open coding, axial coding and selective coding processes, we have identified the core areas of green innovation strategy drivers as well as the expected economic benefits, redundant resources and stakeholder pressure to be the three main areas, based on which a driving factor model of green innovation strategy has been proposed. According to the results of case studies, expected economic benefits, redundant resources and stakeholder pressure are three major factors affecting green innovation strategies. The results show that expected economic benefits, redundant resources and stakeholder pressure all have significant effects on green innovation strategy. The expected economic benefits is an inner driver of green innovation strategy, influencing corporate behavior through managers' assessment of the benefits of green innovation strategy; redundant resources is an internal situational condition of implementing green innovation strategy, being the factor that relates to the ability of the starting and operating of green innovation strategy; stakeholder pressure is the external situational factor and strengthening factor that has an impact on the implementation of green innovation strategy, reflecting the external norms imposed on the corporate green innovation strategy. In addition, this two situational variables, redundant resources and stakeholder pressure, affect the intensity and direction of the relationship between expected economic benefits and green innovation strategy. When the situational variables are weak, green innovation strategy is mainly affected by the expected economic benefits~ when the impact of situational factors is very significant, it is more likely that green innovation strategy will be adopted. This study provides policy thinking and implementation for the government to develop regulatory policies of promoting green innovation strategy. The government can urge enterprises to adopt green innovation strategy by raising the awareness of green innovation, rational use of the role of stakeholders as well as reducing the cost of implementing green innovation strategy.
作者 张钢 张小军
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期113-124,共12页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71072117)
关键词 企业 绿色创新战略 扎根理论 预期经济收益 冗余资源 利益相关者压力 enterprise green innovation strategy grounded theory expected economic benefits redundant resources stakeholder pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Y. S. Chen, S. B. Lai C. T. Wen, 'The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 67, No. 4(2006), pp. 331 - 339.
  • 2M. V. Marrewijk M. Werre, "Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, No. 2-3(2003), pp. 107 - 119.
  • 3G. Hamel C. K. Prahalad, "Corporate Imagination and Expeditionary Marketing," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69, No. 4(1991), pp. 81-92.
  • 4张钢,张小军.国外绿色创新研究脉络梳理与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2011,33(8):25-32. 被引量:77
  • 5S. L. Hart, "A Natural-Resource Based View of the Firm," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4(1995), pp. 986 - 1014.
  • 6S. Sharma H. Vredenburg, " Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development o{ Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities ," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 8 ( 1998), pp. 729 - 753.
  • 7S./5. lnerjee, "Managerial Perceptions of Corporate Environmentalism: Interpretations from Industry and Strategic Implications for Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4(2001), pp. 489 - 513.
  • 8C. Okereke D. Russel, " Regulatory Pressure and Competitive Dynamics," California Management Review, Vol. 52, No. 4(2010), pp. 100 - 124.
  • 9F. E. Bowen, M. Rostami P. Steel, "Timing Is Everything: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships between Organizational Performance andInnovation,' " Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, No. 11 (2010), pp. 1179 - 1185.
  • 10P. Bansal K. Roth, "Why Companies Go Green.. A Model of Ecological Responsiveness," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 4(2000), pp. 717 - 736.

二级参考文献103

  • 1许庆瑞,王伟强,吕燕.中国企业环境技术创新研究[J].中国软科学,1995(5):16-20. 被引量:36
  • 2钱铭贵 施励行.绿色供应链管理实物采行之驱动压力与组织绩效关系之实证研究-以台湾电机电子产业为例.台湾-人文社会科学研究,2007,1(1):72-98.
  • 3Bernauer, E, and Kammerer, S. Explaining green innovation[R]. Working Paper, Center for Comparative and International Studies, 2006: 1-16.
  • 4Charter,C. Sustainable innovation: Key conclusions from sustainable innovation[R]. Paper Presented at the Conferences 2006 Or ganized by The Centre for Sustainable Development, University College for the Creative Arts, 2007.
  • 5Gray, W B, and Shadbegian, R J. Pollution abatement costs, regulation, and plant-level productivity[R]. NBER Working Paper, W4994, 1995.
  • 6Porter, M E, and van der Linde, C. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Eco- nomic Perspectives, 1995b, 9(4):97-118.
  • 7Mohr, R D. Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002, 43(1) : 158-168.
  • 8Jaffe, A B, Peterson, S R, Portney, P R, and Stavins, R N. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufac turing: What does the evidence tell us?[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1995, 33(1):35-68.
  • 9Jaffe, A B, Newell, R G, and Stavins, R N. Technology policy for energy and the environment[J]. Innovation Policy and the E conomy, 2004, 4(1):35-68.
  • 10Johnstone, N. Environmental policy and corporate behaviour[R], in Report for the OECD Conference on "Public Environmental Policy and the Private Firm", 2005.

共引文献259

同被引文献841

引证文献54

二级引证文献841

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部