期刊文献+

企业低碳行为与股东价值关系的实证研究 被引量:3

An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Enterprises' Low-carbon Behavior and Shareholders' Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合我国低碳政策背景,实证检验了我国企业低碳行为与股东价值的关系,研究发现:总体而言我国企业低碳行为有利于股东价值的提升,环境敏感行业的低碳行为与股东价值的关系更显著,但是与被动的低碳行为相比,主动低碳行为并未获得更大的股东价值。这表明我国政府制定的低碳政策取得了一定的效果,但是还需要进一步培育低碳产品需求、明确碳交易或碳税等低碳政策,从而使企业主动低碳行为获得应有的更大市场回报。 The paper made and empirical study on the relationship between enterprises'low carbon behavions and sharehold-er value in the context of Chinese low-carbon policies.The study shows that in general the low-carbon behavior can in-crease sharcholders'value.which is more positive in environmental sensitive indusries.The active low-carbon behaviors do not bring more shareholders'value,compared to passive low-carbon behaviors.The results indicate that the low-carbon poli-cies made by Chinese government have achieved some success,but it still need to foster the demand for low-carbon prod-ucts and make the carbon rading or carbon tax policy clear in order to help the active carbon behaviors get greater market returns.
作者 牛晓叶
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2014年第2期85-90,共6页 East China Economic Management
基金 中央财经大学2012年博士生重点选题培育项目 中央财经大学2012年研究生科研创新基金项目 中央财经大学会计学院"碳会计研究"横向课题
关键词 低碳政策 低碳行为 市场反应 股东价值 low-carbon policy low-carbon behavior market reaction shareholders'value
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Sharma S. Managerial interpretations and organizational con- text as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strate- gy[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(4) :681.
  • 2秦颖,徐光.环境政策工具的变迁及其发展趋势探讨[J].改革与战略,2007,23(12):51-54. 被引量:13
  • 3Karen Palmer, Wallace E Oates, Paul R Portney. Tighten- ing environmental standards:the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9 (4): 119-132.
  • 4King A, Lenox M. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction [ J ]. Management Science, 2002,48 (2) : 289 -299.
  • 5Hsu A W, Wang T. Does the market value corporate re- sponse to climate change [ J ]. Omega, 2013,41 (2) : 195 -206.
  • 6McWilliams A, Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(1) : 117-127.
  • 7Frooman J. Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth: A Meta-Analysis of Event Studies [J]. Business & Society, 1997(4):89-96.
  • 8$harfman M P, Fernando C S. Environmental Risk Manage- ment and the Cost of Capital[J]. Strategic Management Jour- nal, 2008,29: 569-592.
  • 9Sharma S, Vredenburg H. Proaetive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable orga- aizational capabilities [J]. Strategic Management Jour- nal, 1998,19: 729-753.
  • 10王仲兵,靳晓超.碳信息披露与企业价值相关性研究[J].宏观经济研究,2013(1):86-90. 被引量:96

二级参考文献19

共引文献107

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部