期刊文献+

国际投资领域“间接征收”之条约实践 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际投资领域间接征收的定义模糊,其界定标准、类型等法律问题均未达成共识,但间接征收已成为国际投资领域最重要的议题之一。间接征收在双边投资条约、多边投资条约及区域性投资条约中都成为必然规定的条款。对这些条款的比较研究,将有助于中国未来签订投资条约时借鉴。
作者 寇顺萍
出处 《经济研究导刊》 2014年第3期264-267,共4页 Economic Research Guide
基金 教育部2009年人文社科规划项目"中国建构国际经济新秩序法律保障机制研究"阶段性成果(09XJA820007) 国家社科基金2012年重点项目"WTO体制中成员集团化法律问题研究"阶段性成果(12AFX017)
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献27

  • 1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 2LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 3See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 4See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 5Id., 320-324,.
  • 6CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 7Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.
  • 8See Anne van Aakenand Jurgen Kurtz, Prudence or Discrimination? Emergency Measures, The Global Financial Crisis and International Economic Law, 12 J. Int' l Econ. L. 859 (2009).
  • 9SGS v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction( August 6 2003 ) [ EB/OL]. Para. 166.
  • 10Id. , Para. 168.

共引文献167

同被引文献15

  • 1Been,V. and Beauvais,J.C., The global fifthamendment. NAFTA ’ s investment international regula-tory takings doctrine. New York University Law Review,Vol/78,No.30,2003.
  • 2Caroline,H.,Indirect expropriation and theright to regulate: Revisiting proportionality analysis andthe standard of review in investor-state arbitration. Jour-nal Of International Economic Law, Vol. 15, No.l, 2012.
  • 3Gibson, C., A look at the compulsory license ininvestment arbitration: The case of indirect expropria-tion. American University International Law Review,Vol.25,No.3,2010.
  • 4.Gutbrod,M. and Hindelang,S., Extemalizationof effective legal protection against indirect expropria-tion. Journal Of World Investment And Trade,Vol.7,No.6,2006.
  • 5Isakoff,P.D.,Defining the scope of indirect ex-propriation for international investments. Global Busi-ness Law Review,Vol.3,No.2,2013.
  • 6Kriebaum,U.,Regulatory takings : Balancingthe interests of the investor and the state. Journal OfWorld Investment And Trade, Vol.8,No.5,2007.
  • 7Ripinsky,S.,Assessing damages in investmentdisputes : Practice in search of perfect. Journal OfWorld Investment And Trade,Vol.10,No.1,2009.
  • 8Paulsson,J.,Denial of justice in internationallaw. American Journal Of International Law, Vol.100,No.2,2006.
  • 9彭岳.国际投资中的间接征收及其认定[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2009,51(2):64-72. 被引量:20
  • 10梁咏.间接征收与中国海外投资利益保障——以厄瓜多尔征收99%石油特别收益金为视角[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2009(5):143-147. 被引量:7

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部