期刊文献+

多重荧光PCR结合Allglo探针技术检测艰难梭菌相关毒素基因 被引量:12

Detection of Clostridium difficile related toxin gene by Allglo probe-multiplex real-time PCR
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用多重荧光PCR结合Allglo探针技术,建立一种快速、特异、灵敏的鉴定艰难梭菌相关毒素基因的方法,并对浙江杭州地区腹泻患者的产毒型艰难梭菌感染现状进行调查研究。方法应用型研究。针对艰难梭菌毒素tcdA和tcdB基因设计引物和相应的Allglo探针,优化PCR扩增体系,并评价其特异性、灵敏度、重复性。收集2012年8至12月杭州市第一人民医院的门诊腹泻患者粪便标本共180份,对粪便中携带tcdA和tcdB基因的产毒型艰难梭菌进行鉴定,同时通过对tcdA和tcdB基因直接测序进一步验证荧光PCR检测结果的可靠性。结果本试验建立的结合Allglo探针的多重荧光PCR方法可同时、准确、特异地鉴定艰难梭菌tcdA和tcdB基因,灵敏度可达10CFU/mI。定量检测tcdA基因的循环阈值(Ct)值变异系数分别为2.30%、0.42%、0.81%,检测tcdB基因的ct值变异系数分别为1.91%、1.02%、1.18%,均小于5%。在180份腹泻粪便样本中,检测m26份阳性样本,阳性率为14.4%,其中tcdA和tcdB毒素基因均阳性的样本为23份(23/26,88.5%),仅tcdA毒素基因阳性的样本为2份(2/26,7.7%);仅tcdB毒素基因阳性的样本为1份(1/26,3.8%)。同时,采用直接测序方法对样本进行扩增检测和序列比对,与荧光定量PCR结果完全一致。结果显示浙江杭州地区腹泻患者感染的产毒型艰难梭菌以同时携带tcdA和tcdB毒素基因的菌株为主。结论本研究建立的Allglo探针的多重荧光PCR方法可用于临床上快速、准确地检测产毒型艰难梭菌。 Objective To establish a rapid, specific and sensitive assay based on multiplex real- time PCR integrated with Allglo probes for detection and identification of Clostridium differcile related toxin genes, and investigate the situation of diarrhea patients infected by toxigenic C. difficile in Hangzhou. Methods The primer pairs and A11glo probes that were specific to tcdA, tcdB gene of C. difficile were designed, and then the PCR amplification condition was optimized, the specificity, low of limitation and reproducibility were evaluated. A total of 180 diarrheal stool specimens were collected from August to December 2012 from Hangzhou First People's Hospital. Finally, the multiplex real-time PCR results were compared with the results obtained by direct sequencing. Results The low of limitation was 10 CFU/ml. The coefficients of variation for tcdA gene were 2. 30% , 0. 42% , 0. 81% respectively, and the coefficients of variation for tedB gene were 1.91% , 1.02% , 1. 18% , respectively. All of them were less than 5%. There were 26 positive in 180 diarrhea stool specimens, the positive rate was 14.4%. Among the positive specimens, 23 stool specimens were tedA and tcdB positive (23/26, 88.5% ) , and then only two stoolspecimens were tcdA positive to and tcdB negative ( 2/26, 7.7% ), only one stool specimen was tcdA negative and tcdB positive to was detected (1/26, 3.8% ). Then, all the specimens were detected by using a direct sequencing method, and the sequences were aligned with standard. The above results were in correspondence with the results of the real-time PCR. Conclusions The results indicated that it was the main characteristics for C. difficile strains with tcdA and tcdB toxin genes infecting diarrheal patients in Hangzhou, Zhejiang. The assay established here could be used in clinic for rapid, accurate detection of toxigenic C. difficile.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期32-35,共4页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 基金项目:浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY138020003) “艾滋病和病毒性肝炎等重大传染病防治科技重大专项”课题(2013ZX10004103) 浙江省科技计划资助项目(2011C23139)
关键词 梭菌 难辨 细菌毒素类 肠毒素类 细胞毒素类 荧光 聚合酶链反应 Clostridium difficile Bacterial toxins Enterotoxins Cytotoxins Fluorescence Polymerase chain reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Bartlett JG. Clostridium difficile: history of its role as an enteric pathogen and the current state of knowledge about the organism [ J ]. Clin Infect Dis, 1994, 18 Suppl 4 : S265-S272.
  • 2Peterson LR, Mehta MS, Patel PA, et al. Laboratory testing for Clostridium difficile infection : light at the end of the tunnel [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2011, 136:372-380.
  • 3Khanna S, Pardi DS. Clostridium difficile infection: new insights into management [ J ]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2012, 87 : 1106-1117.
  • 4Carroll KC. Tests for lhe diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection : the next generation [J]. Anaerobe, 2011, 17 : 170-174.
  • 5Kubista M. Nucleic acid-based technologies:application amplified [J]. Pharmacogenomics, 2004, 5:767-773.
  • 6Pierce KE, Khan H, Mistry R, et al. Rapid detection of sequenc, e variation in Clostridium difficile genes using LATE-PCR with multiple mismatch-tolerant hybridization probes [ J ]. J Mic.rohiol Methods, 2012, 91:269-275.
  • 7孙长贵,成军.分子诊断技术在临床微生物学检验中的应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2013,36(2):109-112. 被引量:16

二级参考文献19

  • 1陈东科,孙长贵.实用临床微生物学检验与图谱.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:425.
  • 2Liu DY. Molecular detection of human bacterial pathogens. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2011:1-1227.
  • 3Schuller M,Sloots TP, James GS, et al. PCR for clinical microbiology:An Australian and International Perspective. Heidelberg:Springer,2010: 1-433.
  • 4Versalovic J. Manual of clinical microbiology. 10th ed. Washington DC:AMS Press, 2011:27-59.
  • 5Hyman RW, St Onge RP, Kim H, et al. Molecular probe technology detects bacteria without culture. BMC Microbiol, 2012,12:29-38.
  • 6Millar BC, Xu J,Moore JE. Molecular diagnostics of medically important bacterial infections. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 2007, 9:21-39.
  • 7Petti CA. Detection and identification of microorganisms by gene amplification and sequencing. Clin Infect Dis, 2007,44:1108-1114.
  • 8Woo PCY, Lan SKP, Teng JLL, et al. Then and now:use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2008,14:908-934.
  • 9Janda JM, Abbott SL. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: Pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Mierobiol, 2007,45:2761-2764.
  • 10Alatoom AA, Cunningham SA, Ihde SM, et al. Comparison of direct colony method versus extraction method for identification of gram-positive cocci by use of Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol, 2011,49:2868-2873.

共引文献15

同被引文献135

  • 1王静,杨昀赟,杨瑞馥.用PCR-ICT方法检测肠出血性大肠杆菌O157[J].卫生研究,2007,36(3):376-378. 被引量:5
  • 2McDonald LC, Owings M, Jernigan DB. Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996- 2003 [ J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2006,12 : 409-4-15.
  • 3Nerandzic MM, Donskey CJ. Effective and reduced-cost modified selective medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile [J]. J Clin MicrobM, 2009, 47 : 397-400.
  • 4Perry JD, Asir K, Halimi D, et al. Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile within 24 hours[ J]. J Clin Microbiol , 2010, 48: 3852-3858.
  • 5Planche T , Wilcox M. Reference assays for Clostridium difficile infection: one or two Gold standards[ J]. J Clin Pathol, 2011, 64: 1-5.
  • 6Carroll KC. Tests for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the next generation [ J ]. Anaerobe, 2011, 17 : 170- 174.
  • 7Chapin K. Discrepancies in testing recommendations for Clostridium difficile infection: updated review favors amplification test systems[ J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2012, 12: 223-226.
  • 8Tenover FC, Baron EJ, Peterson LR, et al. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty? [ J]. J Mol Diagn, 2011, 13:573-582.
  • 9Uande V, BmTault L, Wadel S, et al. Evaluation of a loop- mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium infections[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2011,49: 2714-2716.
  • 10Grimths D, Fawley W, Kachrimanidou M, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Clostridium diffwile [ J ]. J Clin Microbial, 2010, 48 : 770-778.

引证文献12

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部