摘要
民间融资事件处置结果的司法乱象,在很大程度上是刑民交叉问题缠绕不清的多棱折射。传统以"先刑后民"为主的方式已不适应非法集资案件的特点及司法实践的需要。从刑民关系重构的法理依据看,集资案件的刑民冲突处理应以"先民后刑"原则为主导,以"刑民并行"或"先刑后民"方式为补充。刑民执行冲突的合理协调,应基于风险本位确立集资者债务清偿的优先次序。鉴于公权力不当介入往往对刑民关系处理的社会效果产生不良影响,故引入破产重整的司法程序实为平衡集资各方利益的最优路径。
The judicial chaos about disposal results of informal financing events is largely the entangling and refraction of interlocked criminal and civil problems. The traditional way relying on ＂ criminal procedure prior to civil procedure＂ could not correspond to the characteristics of illegal fund-raising cases and judicial practice. From the view of jurisprudence basis of relation-reconfiguration between criminal law and civil law, the conflict dispose of criminal law and civil law for fund-raising cases should give priority to the principle of ＂civil procedure prior to criminal procedure＂, while taking the ＂ concurrent criminal procedure and criminal procedure＂ or ＂ criminal procedure prior to civil procedure＂ as the complementation. The reasonable coordination of executive conflict in criminal procedure and civil procedure should define the priority of fund- raiser repayment of debt aceording to risk standard. Seeing that the improper intervention of public power tends to give adverse influence to soeial effects on relationship dispose of eriminal law and eivil law, the introduction of judieial process about bankruptcy reorganization becomes a truly optimal path to balance interests of all parties.
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期105-111,共7页
Social Sciences of Beijing
基金
上海政法学院2012年(央财专项)课题(2011YC3006)
关键词
集资
刑民
交叉
协调
fund-raising
criminal law and civil law
intersection
coordination
