期刊文献+

基于职业安全管制效益评价的工人生命价值估算——以中国煤炭行业工人生命价值为例 被引量:2

The Estimation of Worker's Life Value Based on Benefit Evaluation of Occupation Safety Control ——An Example of Workers' Life Value in the Coal Industry of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 因资源稀缺性约束和公共事务多目标竞争,职业安全管制须讲究成本和收益,而管制收益与人的生命价值评估有关。国际理论界已有两种成熟的估算生命价值的方法,即人力资本法和支付意愿法,并分别在不同领域里运用。文章运用这两种方法,分别对中国煤炭行业的工人生命价值展开了研究,人力资本法估算的工人生命价值为435.75万元。支付意愿法表明,按WTP与wTA七倍值计算,WTP下的工人生命价值为582.38万元,而WTP下的95%的置信区间为525.02—690.95万元。综合得到的结论是:中国煤炭行业工人支付意愿下的生命价值合理区间为400~600万元。 Occupation safety control should pay attention to cost and benefit due to the constraints of resource scarcity and the multi -objective competition of public affairs. However, control benefit is closely related with the value of human life evaluation. There are two kinds of mature ways to evaluate life value in international theoretical field based on human capital and willingness to pay, and they are used in different fields. The paper studies workers' life value in the coal industry of China by using the two methods respectively, and workers' life value is 4. 3575 million based on the method of human capital. The willingness to pay method shows that based on the seven times value of WTP and WTA, workers' life value is 5. 8238 million, and 95% of the confidence interval of WTP is from 5. 2502 million to 6. 9095 million. The conclusion in general is : the reasonable interval of workers' life value in the coal industry of China under willingness to pay ranges from 4 million to 6 million.
出处 《云南财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期145-153,共9页 Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于健康和安全管制效益评价的中国人生命价值研究"(70940006) 企业横向课题"基于条件价值法的公司员工的生命价值研究"
关键词 职业安全管制 工人生命价值 人力资本法 支付意愿法 Occupation Safety Control Workers' Life Value Human Capital Method Will- ingness to Pay Method
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献38

  • 1史普博.管制与市场[M].上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999.
  • 2Lenton,Alison Paige, 2002, The Price of Prejudice : Social Categories Influence Monetary Value of Life, (Ph.D.)University of Colorado at Boulder.
  • 3Viseusi,W. Kip, 1993, “The Value of Risks to Life and Health”, The Journal of Economic Literature, 31 , pp.1912-1946,
  • 4Mitchell R. C., and Carson R. T., 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method',Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • 5Gerking, S.,M. De Haan,and W. Schulze, 1988, “The Marginal Value of Job Safety: A Contingent Valuation Study”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1 ,pp.185-199.
  • 6Horowitz, J. K., and McConnell, K. E., 2002, “A review of WTA/WTP studies”, Journalof Environmental Economics and Management, 44, pp.426-447.
  • 7考特·罗伯特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学[M].上海三联书店.上海人民出版社.1994.
  • 8.中华人民共和国国家赔偿法[Z].,1995—1—1实施..
  • 9张新宝.人身损害赔偿的理念更新[N].法制日报,2004.12.28:8.
  • 10.最高法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释[Z].,2003.12.4通过..

共引文献69

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部