摘要
《伤寒论》是祖国古典医学名著之一,也是学习祖国医学的必读之书。但由于该书写作年代久远,辞义深奥,又因历代医家各呈己见,给本来不易学习的《伤寒论》又增添了不必要的障碍。在同一条文中,对促脉的理解就有虚有实、有热有寒,使学习该书的人莫衷一是。本文综合促脉的历史沿革,促字在汉代的意思,并结合历代医家对其的注解,得出了促脉的机理为病情发生转化的时刻,是机体奋起抗邪的征象。同时又根据此种机理对其脉形进行了初步推测,《伤寒论》中"脉促"的脉象当为综合了浮脉之脉位、数脉之脉数、大脉之脉形、实脉之脉势,且无歇止的一种脉象。这是对《内经》中关于促脉认识的继承和发展,与《脉经》中所描述的"促脉"虽名同而实异。
Treatise on Febrile Diseases is one of the classical books in traditional Chinese medicine, and is necessary for learning traditional Chinese medicine. But different opinions about this book were very difficult. For example, different understanding on Cu Mai included deficiency and sufficient. A new understanding on Cu Mai of Treatise on Febrile Diseases was surmised according to several factors. This understanding showed Cu Mai of Treatise on Febrile Diseases was different with Cu Mai of Pulse Classic, and was similar with Cu Mai of Inner Canon of Huangdi.
出处
《南阳理工学院学报》
2013年第6期125-128,共4页
Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology
关键词
伤寒论
促脉
Treatise on Febrile Diseases
Cu Mai
