期刊文献+

磁共振弥散加权成像对急性胰腺炎严重性分级的诊断价值 被引量:10

Diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨磁共振弥散加权成像(DWI)及表观弥散系数(ADC)值对急性胰腺炎(AP)严重性分级的诊断价值.方法 收集57例AP及13例正常胰腺含有DWI的磁共振成像(MRI)资料.参照Balthazar CT分级标准,将AP的MRI表现分为相应的A、B、C、D、E5级,测量炎症胰腺及正常胰腺的ADC值.应用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)对各级别AP之间、各级别与正常胰腺之间的ADC值进行统计学分析.结果 57例AP的MRI分为A级6例,B级9例,C级11例,D级10例,E级21例.炎症胰腺在DWI图像均呈高信号(100%).A、B、C、D、E级AP的平均ADC值分别为(1.138 ±0.024)、(1.289±0.179)、(1.513 ±0.156)、(1.554 ±0.248)、(1.938±0.567) ×10-3 mm2/s,正常胰腺的ADC值为(1.687±0.129)×10-3mm2/s.A、B级AP的ADC值显著低于E级(P值均<0.01)及正常胰腺(P值均<0.05),C级的ADC值低于E级(P<0.05),其余各级别之间,C、D、E级与正常胰腺之间的ADC值差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05).结论 磁共振DWI有利于Balthazar分级中形态变化不明显的A级及B级AP的早期诊断,但ADC值对AP严重性的分级诊断无明显价值. Objective To investigate the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the severity evaluation of acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods Findings of MRI including DWI in 57 patients with AP and 13 subjects with normal pancreas (NP) were retrospectively reviewed. According to Balthazar's CT grading system, the severity of AP was divided into five groups from A to E according to the MRI findings. ADC values were measured at the inflammatory segments and normal segments. Comparison of mean ADC values was performed among each grade of AP, each grade of AP and NP by using ANOVA method. Results Of the 57 AP patients, 6, 9, 11, 10 and 21 patients were graded as A, B, C, D and E on MRI, respectively. The DWI of inflammatory pancreas showed hyperintensity in all AP patients (100%). The mean ADC values in AP of grade A, B, C, D and E were (1.138±0.024), (1.289 ±0. 179), (1.513 ±0. 156), (1.554 ±0.248) and (1.938 ±0.567) × 10^-3mm2/s, respectively. The mean ADC value of NP was ( 1. 687 ± 0. 129) × 10^-3 mm2/s. The mean ADC value was lower in AP of grade A and B than that in grade E ( P 〈 0.01 ) and NP (P 〈 0.05). The mean ADC value was lower in grade C than that in grade E (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant difference of ADC values among other each grade of AP (P 〉 0.05 ), NP and AP of grade C, D and E (P 〉 0.05). Conclusions DWI is helpful to diagnose acute pancreatitis of grade A and B with no morphologic change, but ADC value cannot be used to evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis.
出处 《中华胰腺病杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期21-25,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pancreatology
关键词 胰腺炎 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 表观弥散系数 诊断 Pancreatitis Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献66

  • 1闵鹏秋,严志汉.急性胰腺炎腹膜后间隙扩散——一个腹部影像诊断难题[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(4):342-343. 被引量:30
  • 2蓝瑞琼,蒋亚斌.国产乌司他丁治疗急性胰腺炎的系统评价[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(10):618-619. 被引量:23
  • 3任莹,金征宇,冯逢,有慧,廖泉,戴梦华,郭俊超,孙宏毅.3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像对胰腺癌的诊断价值初探[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(4):581-583. 被引量:22
  • 4廖家智,王家.美国急性胰腺炎临床指南(诊断部分)[J].临床内科杂志,2007,24(2):136-139. 被引量:66
  • 5Takeda K, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis : medical management of acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2006,13:42-47.
  • 6Beger HG, Rau B, Isenmann R, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute panereatitis. Pancreatology, 2005,5:10-19.
  • 7Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology; Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut,2005,54 Suppl 3 : iii1-iii9.
  • 8Pezzilli R, Fantini L, Morselli Labate AM. New approaches for the treatment of acute pancreatitis. JOP, 2006,7:79-91.
  • 9Mofidi R, Duff MD, Wigmore SJ, et al. Association between early systemic inflammatory response, severity of multiorgan dysfunction and death in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg, 2006,93 :738-744.
  • 10Chen CC, Wang SS, Lee FY. Action of antiproteases on the inflammatory response in acute panereatitis. JOP, 2007,8 (4 Suppl) : 488-494.

共引文献200

同被引文献100

  • 1刁星飞,王志平,冯玉兰.新亚特兰大分类下126例急性胰腺炎CT表现特点及病情严重程度分析[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2020,18(1):105-107. 被引量:11
  • 2Xiao-Ming Zhang,Zhi-Song Feng,Qiong-Hui Zhao,Chun-Ming Xiao,Donald G Mitchell,Jian Shu,Nan-Lin Zeng,Xiao-Xue Xu,Jun-Yang Lei,Xiao-Bing Tian.Acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis:Findings on non-enhanced MR imaging[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(36):5859-5865. 被引量:11
  • 3赵志新.MRI评分和Ranson标准在急性胰腺炎严重程度早期评估中的比较[J].中华危重症医学杂志,2012,5(5):31-33.
  • 4中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组,中华胰腺病杂志编辑委员会.中华消化杂志编辑委员会.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013年,上海)[J].中华消化杂志,2013,33:217-222.
  • 5王兴鹏,许国铭,袁耀宗,李兆申.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(草案)[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2007,12(3):206-208. 被引量:261
  • 6Talukdar R, Bhattacharrya A, Rao B, et al. Clinical utility of the revised atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis in a prospective cohort: have all loose ends been tied? [J]. Pancreatology,2014,14 (4) :257-262.
  • 7van Santvoort H C, Bakker O J, Bollen T L, et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis im proves outcome[J]. Gastroenterology, 2011,141 (4) : 1254- 1263.
  • 8Mounzer R, Langmead C J, Wu B U, et al. Comparison of existing clinical scoring systems to predict persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis[J]. Gastroenterology,2012,142(7) : 1476- 1482.
  • 9Mortele K J,Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis:improved correlation with patient outcome[J]. AJR,2004,183(5) :1261-1265.
  • 10Lankisch P G,Struckmann K,Assmus C,et al. Do we need a computed tomography examination in all patients with acute pancreatitis within 72 h after admission to hospital for the detection of pancreatic neerosis[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2001,36 (4) : 432-436.

引证文献10

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部