期刊文献+

强脉冲光和调Q倍频Nd-YAG激光治疗面部雀斑的疗效比较 被引量:25

Comparison of the efficacy of intense pulsed light and Q-switched Nd-YAG frequency doubling laser in the treatment of facial freckles
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨治疗雀斑的有效方法。方法:随机将67例雀斑患者分为2组。A组采用强脉冲光(IPL)治疗;B组采用调Q倍频Nd-YAG 532 nm激光治疗。观察两组患者的平均治疗次数。治疗结束随访24个月,每3个月复诊1次,观察两组的复发率及末次回访时患者的满意度调查。结果:两组的平均治疗次数分别为3.81次和1.77次,两组的复发率分别为47%和26%,两组的平均治疗次数及复发率比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),两组的总满意率分别为84%和91%。结论:雀斑的临床治疗中调Q倍频Nd-YAG532 nm激光较IPL疗效更为确切,远期效果更优。 Objective: To explore an effective approach to treat freckles. Methods: Sixty-seven patients with freckles were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in group A were treated with Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) while patients in group B treated with Q-frequency Nd-YAG 532 nm laser. The average treatment times were compared between the two groups. Patients were followed-up every three months up to 24 months. Recurrence and patient's satisfaction rates were assessed at the last visit. Results: The average treatment times for IPL and Nd-YAG were 3.81 and 1.77 times, respectively (P〈0.05). The recurrence rates for IPL and Nd-YAG were 47% and 26%, respectively (P 〈 0.05). Total satisfaction rates for IPL and Nd-YAG were 84% and 91%, respectively. Conclusions: Q-switch Nd-YAG 532 nm laser is more effective and better long-term effect for treating freckles as compared with IPL.
作者 张蓉 谢骅
出处 《临床皮肤科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期176-178,共3页 Journal of Clinical Dermatology
关键词 强脉冲光 调Q激光 雀斑 IPL Q-laser freckles
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

共引文献39

同被引文献131

引证文献25

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部