期刊文献+

班车通勤次数选择行为研究 被引量:2

Study on Choice Behavior of Commuting Times by Shuttle Bus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对私家车通勤出行者RP和SP调查,分析了性别、年龄、驾龄、燃油价格等因素对班车通勤次数选择行为的影响,建立了基于Ordinal Logit(OL)模型的私家车转向班车通勤出行的频率选择模型.模型系数表明,驾龄小于3a的私家车出行者,在燃油价格上涨时,更倾向于班车通勤出行;驾龄大于3a的私家车通勤出行者,随着驾龄的增加,受燃油价格的影响越小,转向班车出行的频率越低. Based on the RP and SP surveys for car commuters ,factors w hich influence the commuting times by shuttle bus such as sex ,age ,driving experience and fuel price were analyzed .The Ordinal Logit(OL)model was established to analyze the choice behavior of commuting by shuttle bus instead of car .The model coefficients showed that ,with the increase of fuel price ,the shuttle bus was used more frequently by car commuters whose driving experience is less than three years .However ,car commuters whose driving experience is more than three years were less influenced by the fuel price , that is to say ,with the increase of fuel price ,car commuters with more than three driving experience were less possible to become shuttle bus commuters .
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版)》 2014年第1期172-175,共4页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering)
基金 北京工业大学研究生科技基金项目资助(yjk-2011-5635)
关键词 私家车通勤出行 班车通勤出行 SP调查 RP调查 OL模型 commuting by car commuting by shuttle bus stated preference survey revealed preference survey Ordinal Logit model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献28

共引文献135

同被引文献22

  • 1杨晓光,孔灵芝,翟凤英,马冠生,金水高,中国居民营养与健康状况调查技术执行组.中国居民营养与健康状况调查的总体方案[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(7):471-474. 被引量:174
  • 2李立明,饶克勤,孔灵芝,姚崇华,向红丁,翟凤英,马冠生,杨晓光,中国居民营养与健康状况调查技术执行组.中国居民2002年营养与健康状况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(7):478-484. 被引量:1783
  • 3邵洁,关宏志,王鑫.正交试验设计在交通意向调查中的应用[J].公路交通科技,2005,22(10):106-109. 被引量:14
  • 4HOEN A, KOETSE M J. A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 2014, 61: 199-215.
  • 5BALTAS G, SARIDAKIS C. An empirical investigation of the impact of behavioral and psychographic consumer characteristics on ear preferences: an integrated model of car type choice [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 2013, 54: 92-110.
  • 6BOERI M, SCARPA R, CHORUS C G. Stated choices and benefit estimates in the context of traffic calming schemes: utility maximization, regret minimization, or both? [J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2014, 61 : 121-135.
  • 7RAZO M, GAO S. A rank-dependent expected utility model for strategic route choice with stated preference data[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2013, 27: 127-130.
  • 8HENSHER D A, ROSE J M, GREENE W H. Applied choice analysis : a primer[ M ]. New York : CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005 : 213-215.
  • 9PAHA J, ROMPF D. Customer choice patterns in passenger rail competition[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2013, 50: 209-227.
  • 10BLIEMER M C J, ROSE J M. Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2011, 45(1): 63-79.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部