期刊文献+

FMEA、HAZOP和LOPA三种方法的信息共享研究 被引量:4

Study on Information Sharing of FMEA,HAZOP and LOPA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着国内石油化工行业的蓬勃发展,安全事故频频发生,显然人们的安全意识和防范措施跟不上生产的步伐。因此对石油化工行业进行安全评价是必要的。作为产品故障与风险分析的重要手段之一的FMEA,其工作核心价值在于找出潜在故障模式,并预防不良后果。HAZOP分析是在危险识别方面最全面、最有效的评价方法,而LOPA分析方法则是在HAZOP分析基础上作进一步半定量分析,从而提出更全面的安全措施,通过总结三种评价方式在不正常表现,产生原因,不良后果,安全措施等方面的信息共享,提高了化工企业安全评价的准确性和客观性。 The information sharing of three approaches was summarized through overview on the characteristics of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP) and Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) as well as on the information they provided. As one of the most important methods of failure and risk analysis, the core value of FMEA is to find out the potential failure modes and prevent terrible results. HAZOP is recognized as the most comprehensive and efficient method in safety evaluation. Based on it, the semi quantitative LOPA analysis got further study and more control measures were proposed. After summarizing the information sharing of three methods on abnormal performance, causes, terrible results and control measures, the accuracy and objectivity of safety evaluation were improved.
作者 曾宏宇 王伟
出处 《当代化工》 CAS 2014年第2期210-212,共3页 Contemporary Chemical Industry
关键词 信息共享 安全评价 FMEA HAZOP LOPA FMEA HAZOP LOPA Information sharing safety evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献40

  • 1卢卫,王延平.保护层分析方法[J].安全、健康和环境,2006,6(4):32-34. 被引量:23
  • 2王向飞,张玉柱,沈宇军.基于FMECA的装备质量缺陷预防研究[J].装备指挥技术学院学报,2006,17(2):111-115. 被引量:2
  • 3崔文彬,吴桂涛,孙培廷,张余庆.故障模式影响分析方法的整体性与经济性改进[J].大连海事大学学报,2006,32(4):73-76. 被引量:4
  • 4庞奇志,李艳芳,雷芳,鲁顺清.制氧企业安全现状评价技术方法探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(2):114-117. 被引量:6
  • 5国家质量技术监督局.GB/T9225-1999核电厂安全系统可靠性分析一般原则[S].1999.
  • 6Vaidhyanathan R, V. A semi-quantitative reasoning methodology for filtering and ranking HA ZOP results in HAZOP Expert. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996, 53(2):185-203.
  • 7Vaidhyanathan R, Venkatasubramanian V. HAZOPEpert: An expert system for automating HAZOP analysis. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15(2):80-88.
  • 8The American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Dow Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide(7th e,d). New York: The American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1994.
  • 9Scheffler N E. inheretly safer latex plants. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15(1):11-17.
  • 10Gowland R. Applying inherently safer concepts to a phosgene plant acqusition. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15(1):52-57.

共引文献239

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部