期刊文献+

髋膝关节置换术后三种自控镇痛的疗效及安全性比较 被引量:9

The comparison of efficacy and safety of three kinds of patient-controlled analgesia after hip and knee replacement operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察髂筋膜置管、硬脊膜外腔置管和静脉镇痛泵用于髋膝关节置换术后自控镇痛的效果。方法 150例髋膝关节置换术后镇痛患者中,髂筋膜置管组(Ⅰ组)、硬脊膜外腔置管组(Ⅱ组)和静脉镇痛泵组(Ⅲ组)各50例,记录并比较术后各时间段镇痛效果、VAS评分、按压次数(D1/D2值)及安全性和不良反应的发生。结果三组均获得满意的术后镇痛效果,但Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组各时点VAS评分均低于Ⅲ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),Ⅰ组12、24、36 h VAS评分均低于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后48 h OAA/S评分比较,Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组均低于Ⅲ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组D1/D2值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不良反应发生率Ⅰ组明显少于Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论髂筋膜置管用于髋膝关节置换术后镇痛效果确切,安全可靠,不良反应少。
作者 罗学宇
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2014年第2期152-153,共2页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1王俊科,于布为,黄宇光主译.麻省总医院临床麻醉手册[M].第8版.北京:科学出版社,2012:263.
  • 2Chemik DA,Gillings D,Laine H,et al.Validity and reliability of theobserver ‘ assessment of alertness/ sedation scale:study with intrave-nous midazolam[J].J Clin Psychopharmacol,1990,10:244-245.
  • 3Celleno D.Spinal sufentanil[J].Anaesthesia,1998,53(Suppl 2):49-50.
  • 4Poopalalingam R,Chow MY,Wong LT.Patient-controlled epiduralanalgesia after thoracic and upper abdominal surgery using sufentanilwith and without bupivacaine 0.125%[J].Singapore Med J,2003,44:126-130.
  • 5曾因明,邓小明,主译.米勒麻醉学[M].第6版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:410-411.
  • 6陆利冲,汪小海,李浩,郑曼.超声下股静脉与股动脉间解剖关系及其影响因素的研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2011,27(9):851-853. 被引量:19
  • 7苏强,曾友志,唐捷,赵光凤,郝伟迤.480例术后患者使用自控镇痛泵的镇痛效果与安全性评价[J].实用医院临床杂志,2011,8(4):119-120. 被引量:7

二级参考文献18

  • 1马兰.舒芬太尼用于术后静脉自控镇痛的临床效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(6):452-453. 被引量:72
  • 2范里莉,刘秀珍,王卓强,王恒林.术后患者自控镇痛泵使用期间副作用的评估[J].护理管理杂志,2007,7(3):41-42. 被引量:12
  • 3Aouad MT, Kanazi GE, Abdallah FW, et al. Femoral vein cannulation performed by residents: a comparison between ul- trasound-guided and landmark technique in infants and chil- dren undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg, 2010, 111: 724- 728.
  • 4Balls A, LoVecchio F, Kroeger A, et al. Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter placement: results from the Cen- tral Line Emergency Access Registry Database. Am J Emerg Med, 2010, 28:561-567.
  • 5lwashima S, Ishikawa T, Ohzeki T. Ultrasound guided versus landmark-guided femoral vein access in pediatric cardiac cathe- terization. Pediatr Cardiol, 2008, 29:339-342.
  • 6Hopkins JW, Warkentine F, Gracely E, et al. The anatomic relationship between the common femoral artery and common femoral vein in frog leg position versus straight leg position in pediatric patients. Acad Emerg Med, 2009,16:579 -584.
  • 7Duperier T, Mosenthal A, Swan KG, et al. Acute complica- tions associated with greenfield filter insertion in high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma, 2003, 54:545-549.
  • 8Schnyder G, Sawhney N, Whisenant B, et al. Common femo- ral artery anatomy is influenced by demographics and comor- bidity:implications for cardiac and peripheral invasive studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2001, 53 : 289-295.
  • 9Schummer W, Schummer C, Rose N, et al. Mechanical complica- tions and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experi- enced operators, A prospective study of 1794 catheterizations in critically ill patients, Intensive Care Med, 2007, 33 : 1055-1059.
  • 10Gorletto F,Raisis AA,Brearley JC.Comparison of morphine and butorphanol as pre-anaesthetic agents in combination with romifidine for field castration in ponies[J].Vet Anaesth Analg,2005,32(1):16-22.

共引文献68

同被引文献84

  • 1吴小峰,唐智柳,田纪伟.发达国家对关节置换技术之管理—兼谈对我国关节置换技术管理的借鉴[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(6):467-468. 被引量:18
  • 2Dalens B, Vanneuvilh G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca- compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children [ J ]. Anesth Analg,1989,69(6) :705-713.
  • 3Dolan J, Williams A, Mumey E, et al. Ultrasound guided fascia ilia- cablock: a eompaIison with the loss of resistance technique [ J ]. RegAnesth Pain Med,2008,33 (6) :526-531.
  • 4Swenson JD, Bay N, Loose E, et al. Outpatient management of con- tinuous peripheral nerve catheters placed using ultrasound guidance: an experience in 620 patients [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 103 ( 6 ) : 1436-1443.
  • 5Martin F, Martinez V, Mazoit JX, et al. Antiinflammatory effect of pe- ripheral nerve blocks after knee surgery:elinieal and biologic evalua- teon[ J]. Anesthesiology,2008,109 ( 3 ) :484-490.
  • 6Martin F, Martinez V, Mazoit JX, et al. Antiinflammatory effect of pe- ripheral nerve blocks after knee surgery:clinical and biologic evalua- teon[ J]. Anesthesiology,2008,109 ( 3 ) :484-490.
  • 7Brummett CM, Norat MA, Palmisano JM, et al. Perineural administra- tion of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine enhances sensory and motor blockade in sciatic nerve block without inducing neurotoxicity in rat [ J ]. Anesthesiology,2008,109 (3) :502-511.
  • 8Eledjam JJ, Ripart J, Viel E, et al. Clinical application of ropivacaine for lower extremeity [ J ]. Curt Top Med Chen,2001,1 ( 3 ) :227 -231.
  • 9王燎,沈彬.人工全膝关节置换术围术期多模式镇痛的进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(7):527-530. 被引量:17
  • 10王怀江,张大志,李世忠.2种镇痛方法在全膝关节置换术后镇痛效果的比较[J].中日友好医院学报,2010,24(3):155-157. 被引量:7

引证文献9

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部