知行接口及其哲学分析被引量：9

The Interface of Knowing-practicing and Its Philosophical Meanings

下载PDF

导出

摘要接口或界面既把不同的事物区别开来,也把它们联系起来。"接口技术"则是人工地将不同对象连接起来的手段。在人和机器之间,尤其是人和当今的作为信息机器的计算机之间,无疑存在着一定的接口技术,这种技术发展到高级阶段就成为"脑机接口"的形式,并具有了知行接口的作用。当信息技术发展到具有知行的接口功能时,便呈现出日趋深厚的哲学意义,使得传统的"以手行事"和"以言行事"发展到"以想行事",人的"知"和"行"融为一体成为可能;同时,其中所蕴含的本体论、认识论、人本学和政治哲学等方面的问题也凸显出来。 Interface not only distinguishes different things but also puts them together. Interface technology is a means by which to link different objects artificially. There is no doubt that certain interface technology does exist between man and machine, especially between man and today＇s information machine--computer. As an advanced product of man-machine interface, brain-machine interface involves knowing and practicing, and thus possesses the function of knowing-practicing. When information technology （IT） makes such a function possible, the increasingly sophisticated philosophical meanings will emerge. In the process, the traditional ＂doing by hand＂ and ＂doing with words＂ have developed into ＂doing by thinking＂, thus making possible integrating people＇s ＂knowing＂ and ＂practicing＂. Meanwhile, the implied ontology, epistemology, humanism, political philosophy and other issues might also be highlighted.

作者肖峰

机构地区华南理工大学科学技术哲学研究中心

出处《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期111-118,共8页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基金国家社会科学基金资助项目(11BZX026) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(11JZD007)

关键词人机接口脑机接口知行接口哲学分析 man-machine interface brain-machine interface knowing-practicing interface philosophical analysis

分类号 N031 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1The New Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language[M]. New York: Random House Value Publishirtg Inc. , 1997 : 358.
2Long N. Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives[M]. New York: Routledge, 2001:191.
3Haraway D. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature[M]. London: Free Association, 1991:149.
4巴尔迪尼.超文本[M]//弗洛里迪.计算与信息哲学导论.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
5艾斯.计算机为媒介的通信与人-机互动[M]//弗洛里迪.计算与信息哲学导论.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
6徐献军.现象学对认知科学的贡献[J].自然辩证法通讯,2010,32(3):13-17. 被引量：6
7张平.信息技术导论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2011:119.
8肖峰.技术的存在与非存在[J].科学技术与辩证法,2005,22(1):68-71. 被引量：7
9Dourish P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction[M]. Cambridge, MA. : MIT Press, 2001..125.
10肖峰.论身体信息技术[J].科学技术哲学研究,2013,30(1):65-71. 被引量：8

二级参考文献20

1钱伟量.维特根斯坦与技术的后现代策略[J].科学技术与辩证法,2004,21(5):68-71. 被引量：2
2Н.А.别尔嘉耶夫,张百春.人和机器——技术的社会学和形而上学问题[J].世界哲学,2002(6):45-55. 被引量：25
3Minsky, Marvin. Why AI is Brain-Dead[J]. Wired Magazine, Issue 11.08, 2003.
4Cycorp, 2007 - 06, The Cycorp Website, http.//www, cyc. com/cyc/technology/whatiscyc _ dir/whatsincyc.
5Minsky, Marvin. ed., Semantic Information Processing[M]. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, 1969.27.
6Dreyfus, Hubert L. Being - in - the - World. A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. Division 1[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London. MIT Press, 1991 . 1.
7Dreyfus, Hubert L. In Conaboration with Harrison H., ed., Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science[M). Cambridge. MIT Press, 1982.2.
8胡塞尔.《纯粹现象学通论》,李幼蒸译,北京.中国人民大学出版社,2004.85.
9Dreyfus, Hubert L. Heidegger's Critique of the the Husserl/Searle Account of Intentionality[J].Social Research, Vol. 60, No. I, 1993. 35, 37.
10Brooks, Rodney. Cambrian Intelligence. The Early History of the New Al[M]. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press. 1999.80-81,109,86,97.