期刊文献+

代数应用题项目生成的结构分析方法 被引量:1

Toward A Principled Structure Analysis Method of Algebra Story Problems for Item Generation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自动化项目生成是近年来兴起的测量领域,是一种以项目认知加工理论为基础的原则性项目设计(principled item design)模式。其中,如何在项目认知模型基础上,通过任务结构分析的方式系统全面的鉴别和提取任务特征是一个关键环节。基于已有文献中代数应用题的命题分析法、网络语言分析法、关系-函数分析法、任务分析地图等四种结构分析方法,研究探索了能够服务于自动化项目生成的代数应用题任务结构分析方法。该分析表明,前三种方法分别对应于个体解题过程需要形成的三种中介表征,即问题陈述背后的命题表征、事件时空关系的情境模型、以及变量间数量关系的问题模型,第四种方法从过程角度分析了问题解决的认知需求。然而,要实现项目生成的特征提取需求,尚需对现有四种方法所揭示问题特征的心理现实性、特征提取的系统性和完备性、任务领域的适用范围、以及不同方法的整合等问题开展进一步研究。 Automatic item generation is a principled approach to item design that is grounded on cognitive theory of item solution, of which a key step is to identify and extract task features systematically via principled structure analyses of the items. The current study aims to develop such a principled structure analysis method of algebra story problems that serves the purpose of automatic item generation by synthesizing four structure analysis methods that are currently available in the literature, that is, propositional analysis, network language analysis, relation-functional analysis and task analysis map. It is shown that task features extracted from the first three methods correspond to the three types of interim mental representations formed during algebra story problem solving, that is, semantic structure, situational model and problem model, respectively, whereas those from the fourth reveal the cognitive demands at various stages of problem solving. However, further studies are required to investigate the psychological reality, thoroughness, and the range of applicability for such methods before an integrated method of structure analysis of algebra story problems can be formulated for automatic item generation.
作者 杨向东
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期558-570,共13页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(31171000) 上海市教育科学2011年度重点项目(A1117)资助
关键词 自动化项目生成 代数应用题 项目认知模型 任务结构分析方法 automatic item generation algebra story problem cognitive model principled structure analysis method
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Samantha Bouwmeester,Klaas Sijtsma.Measuring the ability of transitive reasoning, using product and strategy information[J].Psychometrika.2004(1)
  • 2杨向东.代数应用题项目生成中的认知过程与任务特征分析[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(1):175-189. 被引量:8
  • 3Michal Yerushalmy,Shoshana Gilead.Structures of Constant Rate Word Problems: A functional approach analysis[J].Educational Studies in Mathematics (-).1999(1-3)
  • 4Marc Sebrechts,Mary Enright,Randy Elliot Bennett,Kathleen Martin.Using Algebra Word Problems to Assess Quantitative Ability: Attributes, Strategies, and Errors[J].Cognition and Instruction.1996(3)
  • 5Mary K. Enright,Mary Morley,Kathleen M. Sheehan.Items by Design: The Impact of Systematic Feature Variation on Item Statistical Characteristics[J].Applied Measurement in Education.2002(1)
  • 6Susan E. Embretson.The Second Century of Ability Testing: Some Predictions and Speculations[J].Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective.2004(1)
  • 7SusanEmbretson,JoannaGorin.Improving Construct Validity With Cognitive Psychology Principles[J].Journal of Educational Measurement.2006(4)
  • 8Martin Arendasy,Markus Sommer.Using psychometric technology in educational assessment: The case of a schema-based isomorphic approach to the automatic generation of quantitative reasoning items[J].Learning and Individual Differences.2007(4)
  • 9Kenneth R. Koedinger,Mitchell J. Nathan.The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects of Representations on Quantitative Reasoning[J].Journal of the Learning Sciences.2004(2)
  • 10Susan Embretson,Xiangdong Yang.23 Automatic Item Generation and Cognitive Psychology[J].Handbook of Statistics.2007

二级参考文献68

  • 1Abedi,J. The no child left behind act and English language learners:Assessment and accountability issues[J].Educational Researcher,2004.4-14.
  • 2Abedi,J,Lord,C. The language factor in mathematics tests[J].Applied and Measurement in Education,2001.219-234.
  • 3Alves,C.B,Gierl,M.J,Lai,H. Using automatic item generation to promote principled test design and development[A].Denver,CO,USA,2010.
  • 4Anderson,J.R. Problem solving and learning[J].American Psychologist,1993.35-44.
  • 5Arendasy,M,Sommer,M. Using psychometric technology in educational assessment:The case of a schema-based isomorphic approach to the automatic generation of quantitative reasoning items[J].Learning and Individual Differences,2007.366-383.
  • 6Blessing,S.B,Ross,B.H. Content effects in problem categorization and problem solving[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1996.792-810.
  • 7Bouwmeester,S,Sijtsma,K. Measuring the ability of transitive reasoning,using product and strategy information[J].Psychometrika,2004.123-146.
  • 8Carraher,T.N,Carraher,D.W,Schlieman,A.D. Written and oral mathematics[J].Journal For Research in Mathematics Education,1987.83-97.
  • 9Carroll,J.B. Human cognitive abilities-A survey of factor analytic studies[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993.
  • 10Chi,M.T.H,Feltovich,P.J,Glaser,R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices[J].Cognitive Science,1981.121-152.

共引文献7

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部