摘要
我国食品安全风险评估科学顾问的合法性危机既体现在"作为行为"中,也体现在"不作为行为"中,突出表现为社会对其作出的风险评估结论持不信任态度。原因在于:科学顾问缺乏科学上的卓越性和独立性及其活动缺乏透明性。需要设计公正和科学的科学顾问成员的遴选制度、广泛和有效地支撑其开展风险评估工作的网络体系、精密和完整的利益声明规则、合理和全面的食品安全风险评估活动的公开等制度来有效克服科学顾问的合法性危机。
The legitimate crisis of scientific advisers of risk assessment for food safety in China arises from both their ＂action＂ and ＂inaction＂, particularly because the public distrust their risk assessment conclusions. The cause lies in the absence of excellence and independence of scientific advisers and the lack of transparen- cy in their activities. In order to overcome the legitimate crisis, it is suggested to design a fair and scientific e- lection system to select members of science advisors, to establish extensive and effective network system to support risk assessment, to formulate accurate and comprehensive rules on declaration of interest, and to adopt a reasonable and comprehensive system open to public of risk assessment for food safety.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
2014年第2期90-99,共10页
Northern Legal Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"合作式食品安全风险规制及其体制化研究"(项目编号11YJC820092)
教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"应急行政的兴趣与行政法制改革"(项目编号NECT-11-0745)的阶段成果
关键词
食品安全
风险评估
科学顾问
合法性危机
food safety risk assessment science adviser legitimate crisis
