期刊文献+

基于ANFIS的人因失误风险严重度识别 被引量:6

An ANFIS-based approach to identifying criticality of human error risk
原文传递
导出
摘要 为提高人因失误风险评价的精度和效率,考虑人因失误对系统的影响,用人因失误概率(HEP)、失误影响概率(EEP)以及失误后果严重度(ECS)3个参数,对人因失误风险进行度量,以满足概率风险评价(PSA)的最终目的。将神经网络和模糊逻辑推理有机地结合,利用获得的120组人因失误风险数据,建立基于自适应神经-模糊推理系统(ANFIS)的人因失误风险评价模型,用于人因失误风险重要性识别。结果表明,用该模型可克服专家判断的主观性、模糊性和不确定性等缺陷,使人因失误风险评价结果更符合实际。 In order to improve the accuracy and efficiency of risk assessment of human error, effects of human errors on the system are considered, and the three parameters namely HEP, EEP and ECS are used to measure the risk of human error to satisfy the objective of probability risk assessment (PSA). Using the obtained 120 sets of human error risk data, a risk assessment model of human error is built to assess the importance of human error risk based on ANFIS. The results show that risk assessment model of human er- ror can overcome the defects such as subjectivity, fuzzyness and uncertainty of expert judgment, and make assessment results of human error risk more realistic.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期72-77,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(71071051 71371070 71301069) 岭东核电公司科研项目(KR70543)
关键词 人因失误风险评价 自适应神经-模糊推理系统(ANFIS) 人因失误概率(HEP) 失误影响概率(EEP) 失误后果严重度(ECS) human error risk assessment adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system(ANFIS) human error probability(HEP) error-effect probability (EEP) error consequence severity (ECS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Trage T A. Case study report on loss of safety system function events[ R]. AEOD/CS04. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1985.
  • 2Gertman D I, Hallbert B P, Parrish M W, et al. Review of findings for human error contribution to risk in operating events[R]. NUREG/CR - 6753. Washington, D. C : US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2001.
  • 3LEE Y S, Kim Y, Kim S H, et al. Analysis of human error and organizational deficiency in events considering risk signif- icance[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2004,230(1/3):61 -67.
  • 4Whittingham R B, Reed J. Identification and reduction of critical human error using a FMEA approach[ C]. Reliability 89, NCSR/IQA Conference on Reliability Technology, 1989:1 -8.
  • 5Yu F J, Hwang S L, Huang Y H. Task analysis for industrial work process from aspects of human reliability and system safety[J]. Risk Analysis, 1999,19(3):401-415.
  • 6Kim I S. Human reliability analysis in the man-machine interface design review[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2001, 28(11) :1 069- 1 081.
  • 7Mosleh A, Chang Y H. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2004, 83(2) :241 -253.
  • 8LI Peng-cheng, CHEN Guo-hua, DAI Li-cao, et al. Fuzzy logic-based approach for identifying the risk importance of human error[J]. Safety Science, 2010,48(7):902-913.
  • 9姚杰,吴兆麟,方祥麟.船舶碰撞危险的自适应神经网络-模糊推理评价方法[J].中国航海,1999,22(1):14-19. 被引量:17
  • 10Sugeno M, Kang G T. Structure identification of fuzzy model[J]. Fuzzy Sets and System, 1988, 28(1):15 -33.

二级参考文献12

  • 1张培红,陈宝智,卢兆明.人员应急疏散行动开始前的决策行为[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(2):179-182. 被引量:42
  • 2周泽华.MATLAB模糊逻辑工具箱的分析与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
  • 3Takagi H, Sugeno M. Derivation of fuzzy control rules from human operator's control actions [ C]//Proceedings of IFAC symposium on fuzzy information, knowledge representation and decision analysis, 1983:55 - 60.
  • 4Takagi H, Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control [ C ] //Proceedings of IEEE transaction on systems, man and cybernetics, 1985 : 116 - 132.
  • 5Sugeno M, Kang GT. Structure identification of fuzzy model[J]. Fuzzy Sets and System, 1988,28 : 15- 33.
  • 6Jang J S,Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing,1997年
  • 7Jang J S,Fuzzy logic Toolbox for Use with Matlab,1995年
  • 8邱志雄,大连海事大学学报,1992年,18卷,3期,247页
  • 9张国良,曾静,等.模糊控制及其MATLAB应用[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2003.
  • 10姚杰,吴兆麟,方祥麟.船舶碰撞危险的模糊决策[J].大连水产学院学报,1998,13(2):29-34. 被引量:7

共引文献18

同被引文献76

  • 1王建民.变频调速恒压供水系统在住宅区供水中的应用[J].工业用水与废水,2004,35(3):49-50. 被引量:5
  • 2李德毅,刘常昱.论正态云模型的普适性[J].中国工程科学,2004,6(8):28-34. 被引量:897
  • 3陈晓光.仓单质押贷款的发展过程介绍及业务流程规范[J].大连干部学刊,2006,22(11):39-41. 被引量:7
  • 4胡庆和,施国庆,黄涛珍,刘卫林.非线性FCA模型在流域水资源冲突风险评价中的应用[J].水利水电科技进展,2007,27(2):6-9. 被引量:7
  • 5Suvi Elonen, Karlos A Artto. Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments[J]. Inter- national Journal of Project Management, 2003, 21(6) : 395 - 402.
  • 6Zohar Laslo,Albert I Goldberg. Resource allocation under uncertainty in a multi-project matrix environment: Is organiza- tional conflict inevitableg. [ J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2008,26 (8) :773 - 788.
  • 7N K Gunasekara, S Kazama, D Yamazaki, et al. Water conflict risk due to water resource availability and unequal distribu- tion[J]. Water Resources Management,2014,28( 1 ) :169 - 184.
  • 8王凤祥.基于综合风险指数模型的仓单质押风险评估与控制研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2011.
  • 9K.ien.A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2001,74:147-167.
  • 10L.A.Zadeh,A Note on Z-numbers[J].Information Sciences,2011(181):2923-2932.

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部