国家崛起与信任状态:一项研究议程被引量：3

Research Proposal on Rise of Nations and Mutual Trust

下载PDF

导出

摘要一般认为,国家崛起与外部信任构建过程并不具有兼容性,崛起国与主导国之间一定会产生某种程度的猜忌和疑虑。国际关系的信任理论则认为,这种疑虑关系属于一种工具信任形态,并未排除基本信任成分。按照信任关系发展的基本层度,在工具信任、情感信任之间可以建立"关系信任"的状态,本文尝试从关系本位出发,构建关于崛起与信任之间的关系理解框架,探究二者同向展开的可能性。最近20年中美信任关系的演进过程已证实:安全崛起的良善前景,关键在于持存关系信任,重视共在策略,增续情感成分,调整相互预期,避免长期滞留于低信任层度。 Nation＇s rise and construction of external trust are generally believed to share no compatibility. When it comes to relations between rising power and dominant power, some degree of suspicions and fears must be observed. However, in international relations theory of trust, mutual distrust would be better explained within category of instrumental trust, or distrust relations still embrace basic trust elements rather than exclude them. Between instrumental trust and affeetive trust, it is possible to introduce relational trust to gain a new vision on the problem of safe rise. For the benign prospect of Sino - U. S. relations, it＇s essential to maintain relational trust status by gaining sentimental element, adjusting mutual expectation towards coexistence and avoiding instrumental drawbacks.

作者刘毅

机构地区北京大学

出处《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 2014年第2期24-33,共10页 Pacific Journal

关键词关系本位关系信任安全崛起中美疑虑 relationality relational trust safe rise Sino-U. S. distrust

分类号 D80 [政治法律—外交学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献49

1Ken Booth, Nichloas Wheeler, The Security Dilemma : Fear, Cooperation and Trust inWorld Politics, Macmillan, 2008.
2Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton University Press, 1976.
3Robert Jervis, "Cooperation under the Security Dilemma", World Politics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1978, pp. 167 - 214.
4Herbert Si Models of Bounded Rationality, MIT Press, 1982, pp. 23 -31.
5Dale Copeland, The Origins of Major War, Cornell University Press, 2000.
6A.F.K. Organski, World Politics, Alfred Knopf Press, 1968, pp. 123 - 127.
7Douglas Lemkea, "Power Transition Theory and Rise of China", International Interactions, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2003, pp. 269 - 271.
8Steve Chan, " Exploring Puzzles in Power Transition Theory", Security Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2004, pp. 103 - 131.
9Daniel Kahneman, "Prospect Theory: Analysis of Decision under Risk", Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979, p. 263.
10Kai He, "The Hegemon's Choice between Power and Securi- ty", Review oflnternational Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4,2010 ,pp. 1121 - 1143.

二级参考文献35

1郭树勇.关于中国崛起的若干理论争鸣及其学术意义[J].国际观察,2005(4):31-38. 被引量：9
2《国语》.上海古籍出版社,1982年版,第357页,第356页.
3.《左传》[M].,..
4.《孟子》[M].,..
5任东来.大国崛起的制度框架和思想传统--以美国为例[A].引自高全喜主编.《大国》[C].北京大学出版社,2004年第1期.第76页.
6.《论语》[M].,..
7.《晏子春秋》[M].,..
8维特根斯坦.《1914-1916年笔记》,陈启伟译,涂纪亮主编《维特根斯坦全集》第1卷,河北教育出版社2003年版第153页,第155页.
9John Feffer, " China the Indispensable?", Foreign Policy In Focus, Much 9, 2007, http://www, fpif. org/fpiftxt/4070.
10Lynn T. Whit ," America at the Taiwan Strait: Five See- narios", Asia Perspective, 3 ( 3 ), 2007, pp. 5 - 40.