期刊文献+

美国华裔儿童汉英双语词汇语义范畴发展研究 被引量:7

The development of semantic category knowledge in Mandarin-English bilingual children in the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过分析问卷调查和控制实验数据,本文从词汇上位范畴联想和词汇同级对比联想两方面研究了48名美国华裔4-7岁儿童汉英双语词汇语义范畴的发展特征。研究表明:年龄和语言经验对汉英双语儿童词汇语义发展均有显著影响,4-5岁和6-7岁年龄组词汇范畴能力差异显著;头胎儿童组汉语词汇范畴能力显著优于非头胎儿童组;英语词汇范畴能力两组未见显著差异;双语儿童英语词汇范畴能力显著优于汉语词汇范畴能力;同级对比联想能力显著优于上位对比联想能力。研究结果为美国华裔儿童双语词汇教学及我国儿童外语词汇范畴教学的策略提供了实证依据。 Using parent questionnaire and controlled experiments,this article examined semantic category development among 4-to 7-year old Mandarin-English bilingual children of Chinese heritage in the United States through tasks on category association and contrast association.The results showed that both age and language experience had significant effects on children's semantic category knowledge development.Specifically,older children(6-7year olds)performed much better than younger ones(4-5year olds)on most tasks.First-born children outperformed later-born children on the Mandarin tasks but the two groups performed similarly on the English tasks.Children's semantic knowledge in English surpassed their knowledge in Mandarin and their responses to contrast association were more accurate than those to category association.These findings have implications for bilingual education in both US and Chinese contexts.
作者 李芳 盛欐
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期246-259,320,共14页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 “汉英及西英双语儿童词汇语言发展的比较研究”的阶段性成果 美国国家教育研究院及斯宾塞基金会赞助(2012-019)
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Bialystok, E., F. Craik & A. Ruocco. 2006. Dual-modality monitoring in a classification task: The effects of bilingualism and aging [J] The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59: 1968-1983.
  • 2Bridges, K. &E. Hoff. 2014. Older sibling influences on the language environment and lan- guage development of toddlers in bilingual homes [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 35.. 225-241.
  • 3Carlo, M., D. August, B. McLaughlin, C. Snow, C. Dressier, D. Lippman, R. Lively&C. White. 2004. Closing the gap.. Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms [J]. Reading Research Quarterly 39: 188-215.
  • 4Chen, X., G. Ramirez, Y. C. Luo, E. Geva &Y. M. Ku. 2011. Comparing vocabulary de- velopment in Spanish- and Chinese-speaking ELLs: The effects of metalinguistic and so- ciocultural factors [J]. Reading and Writing 25: 1991-2020.
  • 5Collins, B., E. O'Conner, C. Suarez-Orozco, A. Nieto-Castafion & C. Toppelberg. 2012. Dual language profiles of Latino children of immigrants: Stability and change over the early school years [OL]. http://journals, cambridge, org/action/displayAbstract? fromPage= online&aid= 8779020 (accessed 21/07/2013).
  • 6Costa, A. & M. Santesteban. 2004. Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 50: 491-511.
  • 7De Houwer, A., M.Bornstein & D. Putnick. 2013. A bilingual-monolingual comparison of young children's vocabulary size: Evidence from comprehension and productionEOL]. http..//journals, cambridge, org/action/displayAbstract? fromPage = onlinaid -- 8826061&fulltextType = RAileld = S0142716412000744 (accessed 24/07/2013).
  • 8Forget-Dubois, N., G. Dionne, J. Lemelin, D. Perusse, R. Tremblay & M. Boivin. 2009. Early child language mediates the relation between home environment and school readi- ness [J]. Child Development 80: 736-749.
  • 9Han, W. 2012. Bilingualism and academic achievement [J]. Child Development 83.. 300-321.
  • 10Hart, B. &T. Risley. 1995. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of Young A-merican Children [M]. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Brown, R. ( 1958). How Shall a Thing Be Called? Psychological Re-view 65、14 -21.
  • 2Bussmann, H. (1996). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguis-tics. London & New York : Routledge.
  • 3Hopper, P. J. , & Thompson, S. A. (1984). TTie discourse basis forlexical categories in universal grammar. Language, 60、703 -752.
  • 4Jiang, Y. A. (2000). Basic - Level Effects in Chinese Lexicon. MA the-sis, National Tsinghua University, Taiwan.
  • 5Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Uni-versity of Chicago Press.
  • 6Lyons, J. ( 1995 ). Linguistic Semantics : An Introduction. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press.
  • 7MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project : Tools for AnalyzingTalk. Mahwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 8Mandler, J. M. ( 2008 ). On the birth and growth of concepts. Philo-sophical Psychology, 21, 207 _ 230.
  • 9Murphy, G. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
  • 10Quinn, P. C. (2002 ) . Early categorization : A new synthesis. In U.

共引文献4

同被引文献87

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部