期刊文献+

简易应对方式问卷的因子分析 被引量:217

Factor analysis of the simplified coping style questionnaire
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过因子分析,进一步探讨简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)内部因子结构,分析因子与心理健康水平的关系,并与SCSQ两维度因子模型进行比较。方法采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样方法,随机抽取山东省5个地级市的5个区和15个县的10个街道和30个乡镇,共计20个居委会和60个行政村,共抽取≥18岁人群23 987人;采用一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)和SCSQ入户调查,实际完成调查22 718人,采用Epidata3.1双录入资料建库,SPSS18.0进行统计分析。结果 SCSQ 20个条目经因子分析可提取出积极问题关注、积极情绪关注、消极情绪关注、消极问题关注、心理疏导五个因子,五维度因子模型和两维度因子模型各因子分与心理健康水平均具有显著相关,不同心理健康水平之间各因子评分具有统计学差异。结论与两维度因子模型相比,五维度因子模型能多维度地反映出SCSQ的内部因子结构组成,同时亦能够很好反映不同人群的心理健康水平。 Objective To explore the internal structure of the simplified coping style questionnaire through factor analysis, to analyze the relationship between the factors and the state of mental health, and to compare them with the two dimensional factor models of SCSQ. Methods Stratified multistage cluster randomization was adopted to randomly select 23 987 individuals t〉 18 years of age from 20 urban neighborhoods (from 10 sub-districts in 5 urban districts) and 60 rural villages (from 30 rural townships in 15 counties) from 5 prefecture-level cities of Shandong Province. These subjects were assessed by general healthy questionnaire and simplified coping style questionnaire, and 22 718 per- sons actually completed questionnaires. Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 18.0 were applied to conduct statistical analysis. Results The 20 items of the SCSQ were divided into 5 factors, which included active problem-focused coping styles ( factor I ), active emotion-focused coping styles ( factor II ), passive emotion-focused coping styles ( factor III ), passive problem-focused coping styles ( factor IV ) and psychological counseling ( factor V ). Every factor score of five dimensional factor models and two dimensional factor models were significantly related with the state of mental health, and every factor score of the different mental health state had significant difference. Conclusion Compared with the two dimensional factor models, the five dimensional factor models can reflect the internal structure of SCSQ in multiple dimensions, and the mental health state of different population.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第3期96-100,共5页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
关键词 应对方式 因子分析 流行病学 Coping style Factor analysis Epidemiology
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1汪向东,姜长青,马弘,等.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].增订版.中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:375-378.
  • 2解亚宁.简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1998,6(2):114-115. 被引量:1611
  • 3Sornberger M J, Smith N G, Toste J R, et al. Non-sui- cidal self-injury, coping strategies, and sexual orientation [J]. J Clin Psychol, 2013, 69(6) :571-583.
  • 4A1-Bahrani M, Aldhafri S, Alkharusi H, et al. Age and gender differences in coping style across various prob- lems: Omani adolescents' perspective[J]. J Adolesc, 2013, 36(2) :303-309.
  • 5Stoilkova A, Janssen D J, Franssen F M, et al. Coping styles in patients with COPD before and after pulmonary rehabilitation[ J. Respira Med, 2013, 107(6) :825-833.
  • 6Bautista R E, Rundle-Gonzalez V, Awad R G, et al. De- termining the coping strategies of individuals with epilepsy [J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2013, 27(2):286-291.
  • 7叶一舵,申艳娥.应对及应对方式研究综述[J].心理科学,2002,25(6):755-756. 被引量:127
  • 8高艳玲.我国应付方式量表研究述评[J].株洲师范高等专科学校学报,2004,9(1):115-118. 被引量:6
  • 9张怡玲,甘怡群.国外应对研究的不同理论视角[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(3):321-323. 被引量:45
  • 10Folkman S, Lazarus R S. An analysis of coping in a middle aged community samples [J] J Health Soc Be- hav, 1980, 21(3) :219-239.

二级参考文献118

共引文献1830

同被引文献2250

引证文献217

二级引证文献1184

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部