摘要
从期刊质量定量评价的角度来看,相对期刊影响因子(IF)来说,H(WOS)兼顾了期刊发文数量与引文总量,评价年限较长,是一个稳健的评价指标;相对于H(GS)而言,H(WOS)更准确、更权威,学术性也更强。从期刊质量定性评价的角度来看,H指数与同行评议法相比较,不具有优势。因此,高校图书馆在订购期刊时,应将文献计量法、同行评议法等多种方法结合起来评价期刊,进而防止高质量的学术期刊被遗漏。
In the view of the quantitative evaluation of the journal quality, comparing with Impact Factors （IF）, the H （WOS） considers the total amount of published papers and the total citation amount, has a longer evaluation time, is a stable evaluation index; comparing with H（GS）, H（WOS） is more accurate, authoritative and stronger academic. In the view of the qualitative evaluation of the journal quality, comparing with the peer reviewed, the Hi ndex hasn＇t the superiority. Therefore, university libraries should combine several methods of the bibliometrics method and the peer reviewed to evaluate journal during the journal acquisition, in order to avoid missing any academic journal with high quality.
出处
《图书馆建设》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第3期35-38,共4页
Library Development
关键词
H指数
同行评议法
文献计量法
期刊评价
期刊订购
H index
Peer reviewed
Bibliometrics method
Journal evaluation
Journal acquisition
