期刊文献+

传统开腹与腹腔镜治疗的穿孔性阑尾炎的疗效对比分析 被引量:17

Comparative Efficacy Analysis of Traditional Open and Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比传统开腹与腹腔镜治疗的穿孔性阑尾炎的疗效。方法:选取我院普外科2011年06月至2012年11月收治的穿孔性阑尾炎患者120例,根据治疗方法的不同分为治疗组与对照组各60例,对照组采用传统剖腹阑尾切除术,治疗组采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术。结果:治疗组的术中出血量与切口大小明显少于对照组,不过住院费用明显高于对照组(P<0.05),两组住院时间对比无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组术后切口感染发生率对比无明显差异(P>0.05),两组没有其他严重并发症发生。两组治疗前WBC、N与L水平对比无明显差异,治疗后对照组的WBC与N水平显著升高(P<0.05),组间对比差异明显(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术具备手术时间快、创伤少、切口小等特点,同时安全性好,对于机体的影响小,在治疗穿孔性阑尾炎方面有着广阔的应用前景。 Objective:To compare the efficacy of traditional open and laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis. Methods:Selected 120 patients of perforated appendicitis were treated in our hospital from October 2011 to November 2012, there were equally divided into the treatment group and the control group depending on the treatment, the control group were treated with traditional laparotomy appendectomy, The treatment group were received laparoscopic appendectomy. Results:The blood loss and incision size of the treatment group operative time, operative time, blood loss and incision size were significantly less than the control group, but the cost of hospitalization were significantly higher than that in the control group (P〈0.05), two groups of hospital stay contrasted had no significant difference (P〉0.05 ). Postoperative wound infection incidence between the two groups had no significant difference (P〉0.05), there was no other serious complications. The WBC, N and L level before treatment between the two groups contrasted had no significant difference, and the WBC and N levels after treatment in the control group were significantly higher (P〈0.05), between the two groups contrasted had also significantly different (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy with fast operation time, less trauma, small incision, and the security is better for the body, it has broad application prospects in the treatment of perforated appendicitis.
作者 陈运佑
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2013年第12期1997-1998,共2页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 穿孔性阑尾炎 阑尾切除术 腹腔镜 并发症 Perforated appendicitis Appendectomy Laparoscopic Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献31

  • 1张传国,刘允,吕超.急性阑尾炎术后切口长期不愈的原因及防治[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(11):878-879. 被引量:26
  • 2吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M]6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.267-268.
  • 3陈淑珍,夏振龙.腹部急症学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994:274.
  • 4卫生部.关于开展临床路径管理试点工作的通知[Z].卫医政发[2009]116号.
  • 5戴力辉,赵亮,姚园,等.对公立医院改革背景下临床路径管理模式的若干认识与思考[J].现代医学管理,2010,36(3):12.
  • 6Masoomi H,Nguyen NT,Dolirh MO,et al. Comparison oflaparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated andperforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg,2011 ,202:733-738.
  • 7Yagnik VD,Halhod JB,Phalak AG. A retrospective study of two-port appendectomy and its comparison with open appendectomy and three-port appendecloiny. Saudi J Gaslroenterol,2010,16:268-271.
  • 8Suttie SA,Seth S,Driver CP,et al. Outcome after intra-and extra-coiporeal laparoscopic1 appendeclomv techniques. Surg Kndosc,2004,18:1123-1125.
  • 9Marescaux J,Dallemagne B,Perrelta S,et al. Surgery wilhoutscars:report of transluminal chiolecystectoniy in a human heing.Arch Surg,2007,142:823-826.
  • 10Saber AA,El-Ghazuly TH ,Dcwoolkar AV ,et al. Single-incisionlaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiportlaparoscopic sleeve gaslreclomy:technical considerations andstralegic modifications. Surg Ohes Relat Dis,2010,6:658-664.

共引文献96

同被引文献61

引证文献17

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部