期刊文献+

内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术尽早经胰管括约肌预切开的安全性 被引量:4

Safety of early transpancreatic duct precut during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)时尽早经胰管括约肌预切开后胆管插管的安全性.方法:前瞻性观察2011-10/2013-08在我院行ERCP治疗的患者,将112例符合入选标准的患者纳入研究.按1∶3的比例随机分为两组:A组导丝首次进入胰管即行经胰管括约肌预切开;B组继续尝试常规胆管插管15 min,15 min内胆管插管成功者为B1组,15 min胆管插管仍失败或导丝反复进入胰管5次时再行经胰管括约肌预切开者为B2组.统计各组胆管插管成功率、胆管插管时间、X线照射时间、并发症的发生率和术后急性胰腺炎相关的危险因素.结果:A组所用胆管插管时间、X线照射时间均比B2组短,差异有统计学意义(7.9 min vs 16.9min,5.8 min vs 10.4 min,P<0.05).A组与B2组的胆管插管成功率,无统计学差异,但B2组胰腺炎发生率明显高于A组(26.9%vs 3.4%,P=0.02).多变量分析提示:插管时间>10 min、导丝进入胰管>2次是术后急性胰腺炎的危险因素.结论:对ERCP首次插管导丝进入胰管的患者尽早行经胰管括约肌预切开是安全的,有利于减少急性胰腺炎的发生率. AIM: To explore the effectiveness and safety of early transpancreatic duct precut in achieving cannulation of the common bile duct. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholan- giopancreatography (ERCP) from October 2011 to August 2013 were randomly assigned into two groups (at a 1:3 ratio). Group A underwent precut immediately after first cannulation with guide- wire sliding into the pancreatic duct, and group B underwent standard cannulation attempts for a total of 15 min. If successful cannulation of thecommon bile duct was achieved within this time and with the pancreatic duct inserted less than 5 times, patients were included in the subgroup B1; otherwise, a precut procedure was carried out, and the patients were included in the subgroup B2. The success rate of biliary cannulation, mean cannulation time, mean x-ray exposure time, procedure-related complication rate and risk fac- tors for post-ERCP pancreatitis were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The mean cannulation time and mean X-ray exposure time in group A were sig- nificantly lower than those in group B2 (7.9 min vs 16.9, 5.8 min vs 10.4 min, P 〈 0.05 for both). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the cannulation rates, but the post-ERCP pancreatitis rate was higher in group B2 than in group A (26.9% vs 3.4%, P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis were more than 10 minutes of biliary cannulation attempts and more than 2 times of cannulation of the pancre- atic duct. CONCLUSION: Early transpancreatic duct pre- cut is safe and effective during ERCP.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第8期1166-1170,共5页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术 经胰管 预切开 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography Transpancreatic duct Precut
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Qayed E, Reid AL, Willingham FF, Keilin S, Cai Q. Advances in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancrea- tography cannulatio. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010. 2: 130-137 [PMID: 21160728 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i4.130].
  • 2Enochsson L, Swahn F, Arnelo U, Iilsson M, L0tr M, Persson G. Nationwide, population-based data from 11,074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP. Gastro- intest Endosc 2010. 72: 1175-1184, 1175-1184 [PMID: 20970787 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.047].
  • 3Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Abraham NS, Barkun AN. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing stan- dard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 1999. 50:775-779 [PMID: 10570335 DOI: 10.101610.1016/S0016-5107(99)701574].
  • 4Goff JS. Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: transpancreatic sphincter approach Gastrointest Endosc 1995. 41:502-505 [PMID: 7615231 DOI: 10,1016/S0016-5107(05)80011o2].
  • 5Elton E, Howell DA, Parsons WG, Qaseem T, Han- son BL. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: indications, outcome, and a safe stentless technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1998. 47:240-249 [PMID: 9540876 DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70320-7].
  • 6Hookey LC, RioTinto R, Delhaye M, Baize M, Le Moine O, Devire J. Risk factors for pancreatitisafter pancreatic sphincterotomy: a review of 572 cases. Endoscopy 2006. 38:670-676 [PMID: 16810591 DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925447].
  • 7Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fermerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, Overby CS, Aas J, Ryan ME, Bochna GS, Shaw MJ, Snady HW, Erickson RV, Moore JP, Roel JP. Risk factors for post-ERCP pan- creatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastroin- test Endosc 2001. 54:425-434 [PMID: 11577302 DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.117550].
  • 8Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, Wong RC, Ferrari AP, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Lich- tenstein DR, Ruymann FW, Van Dam J, Hughes M, Carr-Locke DL. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002. 56:652-656 [PMID: 12397271 DOI: 10.1016/ S0016-5107(02)70112-0].
  • 9Kaffes AJ, Sriram PV, Rao GV, Santosh D, Reddy DN. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2005. 62:669-674 [PMID: 16246677].
  • 10王书智,于凤海,陆蕊,时之梅,王淑萍,黄慧,胡冰.十二指肠乳头插管困难时的操作策略[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2010,27(1):16-19. 被引量:11

二级参考文献8

  • 1贾国法,朱良松,王美玲,李祥兵,王秀侠,单红,吴丽颖.几种乳头预切开方法在ERCP胆管插管困难时的选择应用[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2007,24(3):209-212. 被引量:12
  • 2Horiuchi A,Nakayama Y,Kajiymna M ,et al. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on biliary cannulation based on the characteristics of the major duodenal papilla. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2007 ,5 : 1113-1118.
  • 3Mallery S, Matlock J, Freeman ML. EUS-guided rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts : report of 6 cases. Gastrointest Endosc ,200d. ,59 : 100-107.
  • 4Artifon ELA, Sakai P, Ishioka S, et al. Suprapapillary puncture of the common bile duct for selective biliary access : a novel technique (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65 : 124-131.
  • 5Farrel R J, Khan MI, Noonan N, et al. Endoscopic papillectomy: a novel approach to difficult cannulation. Gut,1996, 39: 36-38.
  • 6Schwacha H, Allgaier HP, Deibert P, et al. A sphinctrotome based technique for selective transpapillary common bile cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc ,2000,52:387-391.
  • 7Lee TH, Parkdv H, Park JY, et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 69: 444-449.
  • 8Lo SK. Intramural incision during ERCP: turning a complication into a positive experience? Gastrointest Endosc, 2008, 67: 634-635.

共引文献10

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部