期刊文献+

胸腰段脊柱骨折的手术治疗研究 被引量:5

The research of surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨后路手术治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床疗效。方法选取2011年2月~2013年10月我院接收的80例胸腰段脊柱骨折患者为研究对象,所有患者均实施后路手术治疗,观察患者手术治疗的临床疗效。结果80例患者经后路手术治疗后,显效51例(63.75%),有效23例(28.75%),总有效率为92.50%;治疗后患者手术后嗅觉评分为(74.8±14.8),运动评分为(72.1±24.8),均明显高于手术前,手术前后比较存在显著性差异(P〈0.05)。结论对胸腰段脊柱骨折患者实施后路手术治疗可显著提高患者的临床治疗有效率,改善患者的临床症状,且术后并发症发生率较低,临床疗效显著,是治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的有效方法。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of surgical posterior thoracolumbar spine fractures. Methods 80cases of thoracolumbar spine fracture patients in our hospital from February in 2011 to October in 2013 were seleted for the study. They were treated with posterior surgery, and the clinical efficacy of the patients was observed. Results All of the patients were cured of 51 cases (63.75%), 23 cases (28.75%) were effective, and total effective rate was 92.50%. After posterior surgery, tactile scores was(74.8 ±14.8) and sports scores was (72.1 ± 24.8) which were excellent than treated before. There was a significant difference between them(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The implementation of thoraeolumbar spine fractures in patients with posterior surgery can significantly improve the clinical treatment of patients with efficiency, and improve clinical symptoms of patients, moreover, posterior surgery can lower incidence of postoperative complications. It's an effective way to treat thoracolumbar spine fractures.
出处 《中国医药科学》 2014年第5期207-208,共2页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 胸腰段脊柱骨折 后路手术 临床疗效 Thoracolumbar spine fractures Posterior surgery Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献50

共引文献56

同被引文献30

  • 1谢学虎,王自立,施建党,牛宁奎,李若楠.胸腰段脊柱骨折椎弓根螺钉单节段内固定的疗效观察[J].吉林医学,2013,34(13):2508-2510. 被引量:1
  • 2黄强民,纳强,张琛,张雄文,杨聪林,陆景华,王建龙,徐恒旭.后路减压及内固定手术治疗合并脊髓损伤的多节段脊柱不稳的疗效观察[J].中国医师杂志,2005,7(6):737-739. 被引量:5
  • 3王晓东,郝定均,吴起宁,贺宝荣.脊柱多节段脊柱骨折的特点及治疗[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(5):382-383. 被引量:19
  • 4李铁锋,何慕舜,曾月东,叶俊强,左文建,欧阳冰,史玉鹏.Z-Plate在胸腰段脊柱骨折前路内固定的应用[J].广东医学,2007,28(4):593-595. 被引量:2
  • 5MeCormack T, Karaikovie E, Gaines RW. The load sha- ring classification of spine fractures [ J ]. Spine, 1994,19 ( 15 ) : 1741-1744.
  • 6Samdani A, Chafetz RS, Vogel LC ,et al. The internation- al standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: relationship between $4-5 dermatome testing and anorectal testing [ J ]. Spinal Cord, 2011,49 ( 3 ) : 352- 356.
  • 7Denis F, Armstrong GWD, Searh K, et al. Acute thoraco- lumbar burst fractures irt the absence of neurologie defi- cit: a comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment[ J]. Clin Orthop Re/at Res, 1984 ( 189 ) : 142- 149.
  • 8Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD,et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 1994,3 (4) : 184-201.
  • 9Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA, Hurlbert J. A new classifica- tion of thoracolumbar injuries:the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentovs complex, and neurologic status [ J ]. Spine, 2005, 30 (20) :2325-2333.
  • 10Liao JC, l~'an KF, Chen WJ, et al. Transpedieular bone grafting following short-segment posterior instrumenta- tion for acute thoracolumbar burst fracture [ J ]. Orthope- dics, 2009,32 ( 7 ) : 493-499.

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部