期刊文献+

细胞块法与影像学法诊断恶性心包积液的临床效果比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较细胞块法与影像学法诊断恶性心包积液的临床效果。方法选取恶性心包积液患者65例,均为肿瘤性心包积液,穿刺抽取积液并制作细胞块,HE染色鉴定肿瘤原发灶,并与影像学诊断结果比较。结果影像学法检测诊断为肺癌44例、甲状腺癌10例、结肠癌4例、食管癌4例、乳腺癌3例;细胞块法检测诊断为肺癌42例、甲状腺癌9例、结肠癌4例、食管癌3例、乳腺癌2例,另有5例未完成细胞块制作。两种方法检测结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用心包积液制作的细胞块进行疾病诊断和肿瘤来源鉴别效果较好,可准确诊断心包积液肿瘤原发病灶。
作者 韦滟玟
出处 《白求恩医学杂志》 2014年第1期81-82,共2页 Journal of Bethune Medical Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1Mookadam F, Jiamsripong P, Oh JK, et al. Spectrum of pericardial disease. Part 1. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2009, 7:1149.
  • 2Mayosi BM, Burgess LJ, Doubell AF. Tuberculous pericarditis. Circulation, 20()5, 112: 3608.
  • 3Little WC, Freeman GL. Pericardial disease. Circulation, 2006, 113:1622.
  • 4Kil UH, Jung HO, Koh YS, et. Prognosis of large, symptomatic pericardial effusion treated by echo guided percutaneous peri cardiocentesis. Clin Cardiol, 2008, 31: 531.
  • 5hnazio M, Brucato A, Derosa FG, et al. Aetiological diagnosis in acute and recurrent pericarditis: when and how. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown), 2009, 10: 217.
  • 6Koga S, Ikeda S, Urata J, et al. Primary high grade myofibroblastic sarcoma arising from the pericardium. Circ J, 2008, 72: 337.
  • 7Holmes DR Jr, Nishimura R, Fountain R, et al. Iatrogenic peri cardial effusion and tamponade in the percutaneous intracardiac intervention era. JACC Cardiovasc lnterv, 2009, 2.- 705.
  • 8Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2010,3 :32.
  • 9Deneke T, Mtigge A. Treatment of cardiac tamponade during electrophysiology procedures: do electrophysiologists need more than drainage? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2009, 20: 284.
  • 10Cheng TO. Hemopericardium complicating acute myocardial infarction. Tex Heart Inst J, 2003, 30: 345.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部