期刊文献+

经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗52例胸腰椎骨折 被引量:23

Treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures through paraspinal muscle approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的手术方法及临床疗效。方法 2007年6月至2010年6月52例无神经损伤表现的胸腰椎骨折患者行后路切开复位内固定术。采用经椎旁肌间隙入路27例;传统后正中入路25例。结果两组患者伤椎Cobb角的矫正度上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而经椎旁肌间隙入路手术在手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后下床时间、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)等方面具有显著优势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者均获得随访,平均随访时间20.4个月,所有患者的伤椎全部愈合,内固定无松动、断裂。结论经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折具有创伤小、出血少和恢复快等优点,是一种安全实用的手术方法,疗效满意。 Objective To evaluate the method and clinical results of the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures through paraspinal muscle approach.Methods From June 2007 to June 2010,a total of 52 cases of non-neurological symptoms patients with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures underwent posterior open reduction and internal fixation.27 patients were treated with the pa-raspinal muscle approach,25 patients were treated with the traditional approach.Results No significant differences were found in the correction of Cobb′s angle between the two groups(P〉0.05).Compared to the traditional approach,the paraspinal muscle ap-proach was significantly advantageous in terms of operation time,the amount of bleeding,postoperative drainage,duration of recum-bence,pain visual analogue score and Oswestry disability index.All patients were followed up for average 20.4 months.All patients with vertebral fractures were healed untill the last follow-up.No loosening or breakage of the internal fixation had occured.Conclu-sion The treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures through paraspinal muscle approach is a safe and practical method of less invasion,less bleeding and rapid recovery and clinical results are satisfactory.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第13期1557-1559,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 脊柱骨折 椎旁肌间隙入路 治疗结果 spine fractures paraspinal muscle approach treatment ontcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1程黎明,曾至立,杨志勇,周家钤,袁峰,张世民,梅炯,王树青,俞光荣.脊柱脊髓损伤流行病学特点分析和手术疗效探讨[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2008,10(3):245-248. 被引量:46
  • 2Zdeblick TA. Laparoscopic spinal fusion[J]. Orthop Clin North Am,1998,29(4) :635-645.
  • 3Onesti ST. Failed back syndrome[J] Neurologist, 2004, 10(5) :259-264.
  • 4Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The pa- raspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1968,50(5):919-926.
  • 5Weaver EN. Lateral intramuscular planar approach to the lumbar spine and sacrum. Technical note[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007,7 (2) : 270-273.
  • 6Kotil K,Akcetin M, Bilge T. A minimally invasive trans- muscular approach to far-lateral L5-S1 level disc hernia - tions:a prospective study[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2007, 20(2) :132-138.
  • 7毛兆光,祝介明,范顺武.椎旁肌间隙入路在腰椎骨折内固定术中的应用[J].浙江临床医学,2008,10(4):502-503. 被引量:9
  • 8李楠,张贵林,田伟,张波,袁强,行永刚,刘波,李勤.经椎旁肌入路治疗胸腰段椎体骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(5):379-382. 被引量:73
  • 9Wiltse LL,Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine[J] Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,1988,13(6) :696-706.
  • 10Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain O, et al. The wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited : an anatomic study [J]Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006,445 : 175-180.

二级参考文献38

共引文献162

同被引文献177

引证文献23

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部