期刊文献+

腰椎融合和腰椎间盘置换治疗腰椎间盘退变性病变疗效比较的Meta分析 被引量:9

Comparison of total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 系统评价腰椎融合术和腰椎间盘置换术治疗腰椎间盘退变性病患的相关临床结果,为手术方式的选择提供参考依据.方法 计算机系统检索PubMed、EMBase、COCHRANE图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库、CNKI中国知网数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库等.检索时间从建库到2013年10月.搜集关于比较腰椎融合和腰椎间盘置换治疗腰椎间盘退变性疾病的临床随机对照试验.通过方法学评估后,提取有价值的评价指标数据资料.应用RevMan 5.1软件对数据进行统计分析.结果 纳入6篇随机对照试验,共1 658例,其中腰椎融合组543例,腰椎间盘置换组1115例.Meta分析结果显示:腰椎间盘置换组在视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(OR=-3.33,95% CI:-5.94~-0.71,P=0.01)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)(OR=-5.21,95%CI:-7.51~-2.92,P=0.00)和并发症发生率(OR=0.45,95% CI:0.21 ~0.95,P=0.04)方面优于腰椎融合组.在手术时间、出血量和二次手术率方面两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).但是在2年和5年亚组分析中发现,两组并发症率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 腰椎间盘置换在近期临床有效性方面可能要优于腰椎融合,但是远期的疗效需要进一步验证. Objective To compare the related clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR) versus fusion in management of lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) and provid available basis for choice of surgical procedure. Methods Computer systematically researched PubMed,EMBase,COCHRANE Library, CBMWin, CNKI, VIP databases for randomized controlled trials comparing TDR and fusion for LDDD. Data were searched until October 2013. The available statistical data was extracted after methodological assessment. The statistical soft RevMan 5.1 was used to analyze the results. Results Total 1 658 cases of patients in 6 studies were conducted, including 543 cases of fusion and 1 115 cases of TDR. The results of Meta-analysis showed that TDR was superior to fusion in term of visual analogue scale (VAS) ( OR = - 3.33,95% CI: - 5.94 - - 0. 71 ,P = 0. 01 ), Owestry disability index (ODI) ( OR = - 5.21,95% CI: - 7.51 - - 2. 92, P = 0. 00 ), complication ( OR = 0. 45,95 % CI: 0. 21 - 0. 95, P = 0. 04 ). There were no statistically difference regarding operating time, blood loss and reoperation (P 〉 0. 05 ). However, there was no difference in term of complication in two-year and five-year sub-analysis. Conclusion Regardless TDR may be more effective comparable to lumbar fusion at the immediate postoperative time, vigorous evidence is still requisite to certify the result in long-term follow-up.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期370-375,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 腰椎 椎间盘切除术 融合 随机对照试验 META分析 Lumbar vertebrae Diskcectomy Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Brantigan JW, Neidre A, Toohey JS. The Lumbar I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the variable sc, rew placement system: lO-year results of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial[J]. Spine J, 2004,4(6) :681-688.
  • 2Patel VV, Estes S, Lindley EM, et al. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008.21 (7) :473-476.
  • 3Glaser J, Stanley M, Sayre H, et al. A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2003,28 ( 13 ) : 1390-1395.
  • 4Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients[ J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2002,122( 1 ) :39-43.
  • 5Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF [ J ] . Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 2004,29 (14) : 1535-1540.
  • 6Weisskopf M, Ohnsorge JA, Martini F, et al. Influence of inlay height on motion characteristics of lumbar segments in total disc replacement[J]. Z Orthop Unfall, 2008,146(4) :452-457.
  • 7Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? [ J ]. Control Clin Trials, 1996,17 ( 1 ) : 1-12.
  • 8Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, et al. Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2- year follow-up[J]. Eur Soine J, 2009.18 (10) : 1512-1519.
  • 9Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion : part I : evaluation of clinical outcomes[ J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 2005,30 ( 14 ) : 1565-1575 ; discussion E387 -391.
  • 10Delamarter R, Zigler JE, Balderston RA, et al. Prospective, randomized, muhicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease : results at twenty-four months [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011,93 ( 8 ) : 705 - 715.

二级参考文献37

  • 1Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16:338-345,
  • 2Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86 : 1497-1503.
  • 3Geisler FH. Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc. Neurosurgery, 2005, 56( 1 Suppl) :46-57.
  • 4Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty : an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine,2003, 28 Suppl : S110-117.
  • 5Blumenthal SL, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part Ⅰ: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine, 2005, 30: 1565-1575.
  • 6Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc Ⅱ after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16:362- 368.
  • 7David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine, 2007, 32:661-666.
  • 8Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Ali el-H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech,2005, 18:353-359.
  • 9Christoph J, Michael M, Karsten W, et al. Clinical Results of Total Lumbar Disc Replacement With ProDisc Ⅱ. Spine, 2006, 31 : 1923-1932.
  • 10Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, et al. Charite total disc replacement: clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J, 2006, 15:183-195.

共引文献10

同被引文献109

引证文献9

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部