期刊文献+

山洪中漂木在拦砂坝前堵塞堆积实验 被引量:6

Experiment on the Clogging and Deposition of Woody Debris Flowing with Torrents in Front of Debris Dams
下载PDF
导出
摘要 山洪和泥石流中夹带的漂木在拦砂坝开口处易造成严重堵塞,使坝体对后续流体的分选效果减弱或失效,甚至进一步威胁坝体安全,因此探讨漂木在拦砂坝前的堵塞堆积规律和影响因素对于工程结构设计具有重要意义。考虑漂木长度L、溢流口开口宽度b、漂木量Vw及流体流量V等因素对漂木形成堵塞的影响,通过实验研究了山洪中漂木在拦砂坝前堵塞堆积规律。实验发现漂木在拦砂坝溢流口的堵塞堆积形态主要有三种:溢流口搭桥型,交错咬合型,坝前停积型。漂木堵塞率在L/b<1时基本保持不变,在1<L/b<3时,随着L/b增大先增大后减小,在L/b=2左右达到最大;漂木拦截率在L/b<2呈线性增大,在2<L/b<3保持基本稳定。漂木大量堵塞在溢流口或滞留在库容区中后部都能形成较高的漂木拦截率。漂木体积含量Vw/V在L/b<1时对漂木堵塞率和拦截率基本无影响,在1<L/b<3时,对漂木堵塞率和拦截率的影响呈增大趋势,随着L/b的增大,增大趋势越明显,在L/b=2时基本呈线性增长。 Debris flow or torrents with woody debris could weaken the disaster mitigation function or threaten the safety of debris dams for woody debris may clog densely in the spillway. Hence, it is important to study the clogging and deposition regularity of woody debris in front of debris dams for mitigation structure design. According to hy- draulic experiments, we considered the impact of woody debris length (L), spillway width (b) , woody debris volume ( Vw ) and fluid volume(V) to the woody debris clogging and deposition. The experiment results show that there are three main types of clogging pattern in the spillway. The first one is several logs trapped transversely by the spillway and then trapping following woody debris. The second one is numerous woody debris arrive simultaneously at the spillway interlocked with each other. The third one is short woody debris deposit in Front of the dam adjacent to the spillway. The woody debris clogging rate is lower than 10% and has little change with L/b when L,(b 〈 1 ,while in- crease firstly and decrease with L/b when 1 〈 L/b 〈 3, reaching the peak at L/b = 2. The woody debris trapping rate presents a linear increase with L/b when L/b ≤ 2, and keeps steady when 2 〈 L/b 〈 3. Either debris clog in the spillway or deposit in front of dam can cause high trapping rate. The relative volume of woody debris(VJV) has little impact on the clogging rate and trapping rate when L/b〈 1, while contributes to the increase of trapping rate and trapping rate when 1 〈 Lib 〈 3 in general. The bigger L/b,the higher increase presents,with a linear increase at L/b = 2.
出处 《山地学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期249-254,共6页 Mountain Research
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAK12B00)~~
关键词 山洪 漂木 拦砂坝 堵塞 堆积 torrent woody debris debris dam woody debris clogging woody debris deposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Nakagawa H,Takahashi T,Adachi K. Behavior of drift wood with overland flood flow[J]. Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst.,Kyoto Univ.,1991,34(B-2):373-386(in Japanese with English abstract).
  • 2Braudrick C A,Grant G E,Ishikawa Y,et al. Dynamics of wood transport in streams: a flume experiment[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1997,22:669-683.
  • 3Lienkaemper G W,Swanson F J. Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in oldgrowth Douglasfir forests[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1987,17:150-156.
  • 4Nakamura F,Swanson F J. Distribution of coarse woody debris in a mountain stream,western Cascade Range,Oregon[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1994,24:395-2403.
  • 5Young M K. Movement and characteristics of streamborne coarse woody debris in adjacent burned and undisturbed watersheds in Wyoming[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1994,24:1933-1938.
  • 6Ashida K,Takahashi T. Study on debris flow controlhydraulic function of grid type open dam[J]. Annuals of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute,Kyoto University,1980,23:433-441(in Japanese with English abstract).
  • 7游勇.泥石流梁式格栅坝拦砂性能试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):113-115.
  • 8韩文兵,欧国强.单切口坝对稀性泥石流的拦砂性能--试验研究与比较分析[J].自然灾害学报,2008,17(4):152-158. 被引量:14
  • 9Uchiogi T, Shima J,Tajima H, et al. Design methods for wood-debris entrapment [ G ]//Proceedings Int. Symp. Interpraevent Garmisch Partenkirchen. 1996,5:279-288.
  • 10Matsumura K,Hashida Y,Kasai S. Effect of trapping floatwood by grid type sabo dam[J]. Journal of the Japan Erosion Control Engineering Society,1990,43:9-12.

二级参考文献12

  • 1韩文兵,欧国强.水石流梳子型切口坝拦砂性能试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):286-288. 被引量:11
  • 2池谷浩 上原信司.切口拦砂坝调节泥砂效果的实验研究[J].新砂防,1980,(114):37-44.
  • 3李三畏.奥地利与台湾地区之砂防工程[J].中华水土保持学报,1986,17(2):15-26.
  • 4薛祖淇,连惠邦,A型梳子坝与梳子坝试验之比较分析[J].海峡两岸山地灾害与环境保育研究(第二卷),台中:中华防灾学会·中兴大学编印,2000,pp143-153.
  • 5渡边正幸 水山高久 水原信司.土石流对策砂防设施的检讨.新砂防,1980,115:40-45.
  • 6Mizuhara. T, Suzugi. H, Oikawa. Y, and Morita. A, "Experimental Study on Permeable Sabo Dam," Journal of the Japan Erosion Control Engineering Society, 1988,41 (2), pp21 - 25 ( in Japanese).
  • 7Mizuhara. T, Kobashi. S; and Mizuno. H, "Control of passing sediment with grid-type dams," Journal of the Japan Erosion Control Engineering Society, 1995,47 ( 5 ), pp8 - 13 ( in Japanese).
  • 8林裕益 江永哲.梳子坝调节土石流功效之研究.中华水土保持学报,1988,19(1):40-57.
  • 9李明晃 江永哲.立体格子坝防治土石流之功效研究.中兴大学林学报,1989,38(2):191-216.
  • 10江永哲 吴明煦.A型梳子坝防治土石流功效之研究.中华水土保持学报,1990,21(2):29-43.

共引文献17

同被引文献86

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部