摘要
目的:比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术的疗效。方法:选择2011年1月-2013年1月在笔者所在医院行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的78例患者作为腹腔镜组,选择笔者所在医院同期行小切口胆囊切除术治疗的70例患者作为小切口组,比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、并发症情况。结果:腹腔镜组手术时间明显长于小切口组,而腹腔镜组术中出血量明显少于小切口组,腹腔镜组住院时间明显短于小切口组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与小切口胆囊切除术比较,腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有创伤小、出血少、并发症少等优点,且能缩短住院时间,促进患者病情尽快恢复,值得广泛推广和应用。
Objective：To compare the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and small-incision cholecystectomy.Method：From January 2011 to January 2013 in author’s hospital,78 cases with laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected as the laparoscopic group,and 70 cases with small-incision cholecystectomy were selected as the small-incision group,the operative time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,complications were compared between two groups.Result：The operative time of laparoscopic group was significantly longer than the small-incision group,while the blood loss of laparoscopic group was significantly less than the small-incision group,the length of hospital stay of laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than the small-incision group,the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）.The difference of postoperative complications incidence rate between two group was statistically significant（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Compared with the small-incision cholecystectomy,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has less trauma,less bleeding,fewer complications,shorter hospital stays and can promote the early resumption of the patient’s condition,shall be popularized and applied.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2014年第14期30-31,共2页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
腹腔镜胆囊切除术
小切口胆囊切除术
并发症
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Small incision cholecystectomy
Complication
