期刊文献+

老年脊柱转移瘤行姑息减压术的疗效与生存率的探讨 被引量:4

Palliative decompression for senile spinal metastases:efficacy and survival rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析姑息减压手术应用于老年脊柱转移瘤中的临床疗效和生存率。方法根据患者预生存期以及一般身体情况选择行姑息减压手术的为观察组,行肿瘤切除手术为对照组,比较患者术后的临床疗效、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、Frankel分级、ECOG评分,采用Kaplan-Meier法对患者的生存率进行评估。结果观察组术前存在脊髓功能障碍的患者术后81.5%Frankel分级有改善,对照组为80.0%,两组发生神经功能恶化的例数分别为18例与10例,中位时间为6个月与13个月。结论姑息减压术手术时间短、术中出血量少、并发症较少、手术风险少,对于一般情况较差,预估生存期小于半年的老年脊柱转移瘤患者是一种有价值的治疗方法。 Objective To analyze the clinical effectiveness and survival rate of applying palliative decompression operation to elderly patients with spinal metastasis.Methods The patients were divided into experimental group and control group based on the preliminary lifetime and general situation of the patients.The patients in experimental group were subjected to palliative decompression operation,and those in control group to tumor resection operation.The clinical effectiveness,VAS,Frankel grading and ECOG were compared,and the survival rate was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier.Results 81.5% of the patients with spinal dysfunction in experimental group vs.80.0%in control group were improved in Frankel grading.Neurologic deterioration occurred in 18 patients in experimental group,and 10 patients in control group,respectively.The median time was from6 months to 13 months.Conclusion The palliative decompression operation has many advantages:shorter operating period,less intraoperative blood loss,less complications,and less surgical risks.It is a valuable therapeutic method for the elderly patients whose general situation is poor and preliminary lifetime is shorter than half a year.
作者 蒋杰
出处 《骨科》 CAS 2014年第2期76-79,共4页 ORTHOPAEDICS
关键词 姑息减压手术 老年脊柱转移瘤 临床疗效 生存率分析 Palliative decompression operation Elderly patients with spinal metastasis Clinical effectiveness Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献83

  • 1李熙雷,董健.脊柱转移性肿瘤的外科治疗[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(16):4618-4620. 被引量:8
  • 2金萍,李萍,潘景艳,梁静,樊素兰.腹腔镜下肾癌根治性切除术患者的护理[J].中国实用护理杂志(中旬版),2007,23(7):33-34. 被引量:3
  • 3Feiz-Erfan I,Rhines LD,Weinberg JS. The role of surgery in the management of metastatic spinal tumors [J].Semin Oncol, 2008,35 (2) : 108-117.
  • 4Sundaresan N,Rothman A,Manhart K,et al.Surgery for solitary metastases of the spine:rationale and results of treatment[J]. Spine ,2002,27(16) : 1802-1806.
  • 5Ibrahim A,Crockard A,Antonietti P,et al. Does spinal surgery improve the quality of life for those with extradural (spinal) osseous metastases?An international multicenter prospective observational study of 223 patients [J].J Neurosurg Spine, 2008,8(3) :271-278.
  • 6Gilbert RW,Kim JH,Posner JB.Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumar:diagnosis and treatment [J].Ann Neurol, 1998,3(2) :40-51.
  • 7Patchell R,Tibbs P,Regine W,et al.Direct decompressive surreal resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression causeb by metastatic cancer:a randomised trial [J].Lancet,2005,366 (20) : 643-648.
  • 8Tokuhashi Y,Matsuzaki H,Oda H, et al. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis[J].Spine, 2005,30 ( 19 ) : 2186-2191.
  • 9Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N. Outcome of treatment for spinal metastases using scoring sysem for preoperative evaluation of prognusis[J].Spine ,2009,34( 1 ) :69-73.
  • 10Tomita K,Kawahara N,Kobayashi T,et al.Surgical strategy for spinal metastases[J].Spine,2001,26(3) :298-306.

共引文献36

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部