1FLEMING R,DESHPANDE N, TRAYNOR I, et al. Dy- namics of FSH-induced follicular growth in subfertile women: relationship with age, insulin re-sistance, oocyte yield and anti-Mullerian hormone [J]. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(6):1436-1441.
2CHUANG CC, CHEN CD, CHAO KH, et al. Age is a bet- ter predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle -- stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization[J]. FertilSteril, 2003, 79(1):63-68.
8SHRIM A,ELIZUR SE,SEIDMAN DS, et al. Elevated day 3 FSH/LH ratio due to low LH concentrations predicts re- duced ovarian response [J]. Reproductive Bio Medicine Online,2006,12( 4):41 $-422.
6Brown JR, Liu HC, Sewitch KF, et al. Variability of day 3 folide-stiumlating hormone levels in eumenorrheic women. J Repord Med, 1995,40:620-624.
7Craig H. Syrop, Ann Willhoite, Bradley J, et al. Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil and Streil, 1995, 64:1167-1171.
8Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, el al. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response.Hum Reprod, 1997,12:294-297.
9Bancsi, Frank J M Brroekmans, et al. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril, 2002,77:328-336.
10K F Miller, M Attaran, .J M Goldberg, et al. Response to clomiphene challenge predicts outcome of ovarianm stimulation for IVF. Fertil Steril, 2001,76, Suppl: S132.
