期刊文献+

决不能把伪简当作“中华文明的根脉” 被引量:2

The Fake Bamboo Slips should not be Regarded as “the Roots of Chinese Civilization”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《清华大学藏战国竹简》第1辑中有一篇《耆夜》,使用若干汉代以后才出现的词语,其中有些词语是长期演化生成的,这证明清华简是现代人的伪作。清华简整理者也看出《耆夜》有些词语有作伪的嫌疑,但未实事求是地指出来,反而用掩饰性的注释为之遮掩,把伪简注释成真简。有人把这样一部清华简称为"中华文明的根脉",岂不荒唐? Abstract:The Bamboo Manuscripts Qiye(耆夜)found in Volume 1 of Tsinghua University Warring States Bamboo Manuscripts. In this article there exist some words which used after Han Dynasty, and some words had a very long historical evolution process, from this aspect, it could testify that Tsinghua bamboo Manuscripts was forged by the present-day people. The researcher of Tsinghua bamboo manuscripts had already suspected the forgery of words in Qiye(耆夜). However, they did not point out their doubts honestly. On the contrary, they applied the masked annotations to distort the truth and made the bamboo manuscripts seemed to be genuine. How ridiculous it is for some people to regard the Tsinghua bamboo Slips as "the roots of Chinese civilization"!
作者 房德邻
机构地区 北京大学历史系
出处 《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期104-108,共5页 Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
关键词 清华简 耆夜 燕礼 饮至 Tsinghua Bamboo Slips Qiye Protocol of Banquet Protocol of Drinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1《收藏家》1999年第4期.
  • 2《故宫博物院院刊》2013年第4期.
  • 3明·申时行.《赐闲堂集》卷二十,明万历刻本.
  • 4《大戴礼·保傅》.

共引文献3

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部