期刊文献+

MRI动态增强对鼻咽癌同步放化疗敏感性的预测研究 被引量:14

Application of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting the Sensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma to Concurrent Chemoradiation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨MRI动态增强扫描(DCE-MRI)预测鼻咽癌同步放化疗敏感性的价值。方法 2009年10月至2012年6月经本院鼻咽镜活检病理证实并行同步放化疗的鼻咽癌患者共63例。所有患者于治疗前行DCEMRI,测量肿瘤平均、高强化区及低强化区时间信号强度曲线及半定量参数,包括达峰时间(TTP)、正性增强积分(PEI)、最大上升斜率(MSI)、最大下降斜率(MSD)。于放疗50 Gy再次行MR检查,依据肿瘤消退率(RS0-50)分为治疗敏感组、疗效中间组及治疗抗拒组。分析治疗前肿瘤DCE-MRI参数与RS0-50的相关性及其预测治疗敏感及抗拒的价值。结果与消退率具有统计学意义相关性的参数包括:治疗前肿瘤平均、高强化区及低强化区的曲线类型、TTP及MSD,r=-0.646^-0.746、-0.667^-0.681及0.281~0.301;平均MSI、低强化区MSI及高强化区PEI,r=0.287、0.372及-0.254。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析显示以肿瘤低强化区TTP<70 s为阈值预测肿瘤治疗敏感,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为100%、56.9%、36.3%、100%及65.1%;以肿瘤平均TTP>70 s为阈值预测肿瘤治疗抗拒,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为100%、80.4%、54.5%、100%及84.1%。结论 DCE-MRI半定量参数能够较好地预测鼻咽癌治疗后消退情况与治疗敏感性,有望为鼻咽癌个体化治疗提供依据。 Objective To investigate the value of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) performed before treatment in predicting the sensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to concurrent chemoradiation. Methods During the period from October 2009 to June 2012 at authors' hospital, concurrent chemoradiation therapy was carried out in 63 patients with pathologically proved nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Pretreatment DCE MRI was performed in all patients. The time-signal intensity curve (TIC) and semiquantitative parameters of the mean and high enhanced areas aswell as the low enhanced areas, including time to peak (TTP), positive enhancement integral ( PEI), maximum slop of increase (MSI) and maximum slop of decrease (MSD) were measured. After receiving 50Gy dose, the patient was reexam- ined with DCE MRI. According to the tumor regression rate (RS0 50) the patients were divided into sensitive therapeutic effect group, moderate therapeutic effect group and resistant therapeutic effect group. The correlations between pretreatmentDCE MRI parameters and the tumor regression rate were analyzed, and their values in predicting sensitive and resistant therapeutic effect were estimated. Results The semiquantitative parameters, that carried certain statistically significant correlations with the tumor regression rate, included TIC, TTP and MSD of the pretreatment mean and high enhanced areasas well as the low enhanced areas ( r = - 0. 646 to - 0. 746, r = - 0. 667 to - 0. 681 and r = 0.281 - 0. 301, respectively), the mean MSI of tumor, MSI of low enhanced areas (r =0.287 and r =0. 372, respectively) and PEI of tumor high enhance areas (r = - 0. 254). ROC analysis showed that when setting 〈 70s as the threshold of TIP at tumor low enhanced area the predicting sensitive therapeutic effect, the specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), nega-rive predictive value (NPV) and accuracy was 100%, 56.9% , 36.3% , 100% and 65.1% respectively, and when setting 〉 70s as the threshold of TTP the predicting resistant therapeutic effect, the specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV and accuracy was 100%, 80.4%, 54.5% , 100% and 84.1% respectively. Conclusion Pretreatrnent semiquantitative parameters of DCE MRI can well predict tumor regression rate and sensitivity to concurrent chemoradiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, It is hopeful that these parameters of DCE MRI may become a useful reference in making clinical individualized therapeutic scheme.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期689-694,共6页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 鼻咽癌 磁共振成像 同步放化疗 敏感性 Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Magnetic resonance imaging Concurrent chemoradiation Sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Yi JL, Gao L, Huang XD, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radical radiotherapy alone : Ten-year experience of a single institu- tion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,65:161.
  • 2Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions : Correla- tion of contrast medium enhancement patterns on mr images with his- topathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology, 1996,200: 639.
  • 3Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast mr ima- ging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential di- agnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology, 1999,211 : 101.
  • 4Quintiliani M. The oxygen effect in radiation inactivation of DNA and enzymes. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med, 1986,50 :573.
  • 5Nordsmark M, Bentzen SM, Rudat V, et al. Prognostic value of tumor oxygenation in 397 head and neck tumors after primary radiation therapy. An international multi-center study. Radiother Oncol, 2005,77 : 18.
  • 6Rudat V, Stadler P, Becker A,et al. Predictive value of the tumor ox- ygenation by means of po2 histography in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol,2001,177 :462.
  • 7Nordsmark M, Overgaard J. A confirmatory prognostic study on oxy- genation status and loco-regional control in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated by radiation therapy. Radiother On- col ,2000,57:39.
  • 8Bayer C,Shi K,Astner ST, et al. Acute versus chronic hypoxia: Why a simplified classification is simply not enough. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ,2011,80:965.
  • 9Maftei CA, Bayer C,Shi K,et al. Quantitative assessment of hypoxia subtypes in microeireulatory supply units of malignant tumors using (immuno-) fluorescence techniques. Strahlenther Onkol,2011,187 : 260.
  • 10Cho H, Aekerstaff E, Carlin S, et al. Noninvasive multimodality ima- ging of the tumor mieroenvironment: Registered dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography studies of a pre- clinical tumor model of tumor hypoxia. Neoplasia,2009,11:247.

二级参考文献14

  • 1刘洋,周洋,张修石,于树江.宫颈癌MR分期与临床分期及病理对照研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(2):158-162. 被引量:8
  • 2Nam H, Park W, Huh SJ, et al. The prognostic significance of tumor volume regression during radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer using MRI. Gynecol Oncol, 2007,107:320-325.
  • 3Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Zheng J, et al. Tumor size evaluated by pelvic examination compared with 3D quantitative analysis in the prediction of outcome for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1997,39:395-404.
  • 4Ohara K, Tanaka Y, Tsunoda H, et al. Preliminary estimation of treatment effect on uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma in terms of tumor regression rate : comparison between chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone. Radiat Med ,2005,23 :25 -29.
  • 5Grigiene R, Valuckas KP, Aleknavicius E, et al. The value of prognostic factors for uterine cervical cancer patients treated with irradiation alone. BMC Cancer,2007,7:234.
  • 6Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Coakley FV, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation-ACRIN/ GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Radiology ,2007,245 : 491-498.
  • 7Lyng H, Vorren A, Sundfor K, et al. Intra- and intertumor heterogeneity in blood perfusion of human cervical cancer before treatment and after radiotherapy. Int J Cancer,2001,96:182-190.
  • 8Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Arnhoh JC, et al. Pixel analysis of MR perfusion imaging in predicting radiation therapy outcome in cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging,2000,12 : 1027-1033.
  • 9Yamashita Y, Baba T, Baba Y, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmaeokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy. Radiology ,2000,216:803-809.
  • 10Loncaster J, Carrington B, Sykes J, et al. Prediction of radiotherapy outcome using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,54: 759-767.

共引文献19

同被引文献114

  • 1张兰芳,黄生富,魏宝清,钱普东,郭震.局部复发鼻咽癌的MRI诊断及临床意义[J].放射学实践,2011,26(1):17-21. 被引量:11
  • 2钟镜联,梁碧玲,丁忠祥,沈君,黄穗乔,叶瑞心,谢榜昆,孙颖.应用MRI动态增强技术鉴别鼻咽癌放疗后枕骨斜坡纤维化与肿瘤复发[J].癌症,2006,25(1):105-109. 被引量:17
  • 3Jun-Won Yun,Min-Jeong Son,Mohamed A. Abdelmegeed,Atrayee Banerjee,Timothy R. Morgan,Seong-Ho Yoo,Byoung-Joon Song.Binge alcohol promotes hypoxic liver injury through a CYP2E1–HIF-1α-dependent apoptosis pathway in mice and humans[J]. Free Radical Biology and Medicine . 2014
  • 4Buadu LD,Murakami J,Murayama S,et al.Breast lesions:correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.Radiology,1996,200:639-649.
  • 5Kuhl CK,Mielcareck P,Klaschik S,et al.Dynamic breast MR imaging:are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?Radiology,1999,211:101-110.
  • 6Seki H,Azumi R,Kimura M,et al.Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix:assessment with dynamic MR imaging.Am J Roentgenol,1997,168:1579-1585.
  • 7Iwata S,Joja I,Okuno K,et al.Cervical carcinoma with fullthickness stromal invasion:efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametnal involvement.Radiat Med,2002,20:247-255.
  • 8Zheng D,Chen Y,Liu X,et al.Early response to chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment:value of dynamic contrast-enhanced 3.0 T MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging,2015,41:1528-1540.
  • 9Loncaster JA,Carrington BM,Sykes JR,et al.Prediction of radiotherapy outcome using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of carcinoma of the cervix.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,54:759-767.
  • 10Marcus CD,Ladam-Marcus V,Cucu C,et al.Imaging techniques to evaluate the response to treatment in oncology:current standards and perspectives.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2009,72:217-238.

引证文献14

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部